• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

克拉霉素和阿奇霉素对大环内酯敏感及耐药肺炎链球菌菌株的血清杀菌活性比较

Comparative serum bactericidal activity of clarithromycin and azithromycin against macrolide-sensitive and resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

作者信息

Stein G E, Schooley S

机构信息

Michigan State University, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, B-320 Life Sciences Bldg., East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001 Mar;39(3):181-5. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(00)00239-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0732-8893(00)00239-x
PMID:11337186
Abstract

The serum pharmacodynamics of clarithromycin and azithromycin were studied against isolates of S. pneumoniae, including efflux resistant (M. phenotype) strains, by analyzing their serum bactericidal activity (SBA) over time. Normal healthy subjects were given a single 500 mg oral dose of these macrolides and serum samples were collected over 12 hrs. Paired isolates with MICs ranging from 0.25 ug/ml to 8.0 ug/ml were analyzed. Prolonged (at least 6 hrs) SBA was observed with clarithromycin for strains with MICs < or = 2.0 ug/ml. No SBA was observed in strains with MICs >or = 4.0 ug/ml. Azithromycin exhibited SBA for at least 6 hrs for strains up to a MIC = 0.5 ug/ml. No SBA was observed for isolates with MICs > or = 1.0 ug/ml. In contrast to azithromycin, clarithromycin exhibited SBA for at least one-half of its normal dosing interval against S. pneumoniae strains well above its current susceptibility breakpoint concentration of 0.25 microg/ml. These findings may have relevance to the ongoing debate as to the appropriate susceptibility breakpoints for the newer macrolides.

摘要

通过分析克拉霉素和阿奇霉素随时间的血清杀菌活性(SBA),研究了它们对肺炎链球菌分离株(包括外排耐药M表型菌株)的血清药效学。给正常健康受试者单次口服500mg这些大环内酯类药物,并在12小时内收集血清样本。分析了MIC范围为0.25μg/ml至8.0μg/ml的配对分离株。对于MIC≤2.0μg/ml的菌株,克拉霉素观察到SBA延长(至少6小时)。对于MIC≥4.0μg/ml的菌株,未观察到SBA。对于MIC = 0.5μg/ml的菌株,阿奇霉素表现出至少6小时的SBA。对于MIC≥1.0μg/ml的分离株,未观察到SBA。与阿奇霉素不同,克拉霉素在其正常给药间隔的至少一半时间内对肺炎链球菌菌株表现出SBA,这些菌株远高于其当前0.25μg/ml的敏感断点浓度。这些发现可能与关于新型大环内酯类药物适当敏感断点的持续争论有关。

相似文献

1
Comparative serum bactericidal activity of clarithromycin and azithromycin against macrolide-sensitive and resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae.克拉霉素和阿奇霉素对大环内酯敏感及耐药肺炎链球菌菌株的血清杀菌活性比较
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001 Mar;39(3):181-5. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(00)00239-x.
2
Comparison of bactericidal activity after multidose administration of clarithromycin, azithromycin, and ceruroxime axetil against Streptococcus pneumoniae.克拉霉素、阿奇霉素和头孢克肟多剂量给药后对肺炎链球菌杀菌活性的比较。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1998 Nov;10(4):279-83. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(98)00057-0.
3
In vitro activity and pharmacodynamics of azithromycin and clarithromycin against Streptococcus pneumoniae based on serum and intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics.基于血清和肺内药代动力学的阿奇霉素和克拉霉素对肺炎链球菌的体外活性及药效学研究
Clin Ther. 2001 Mar;23(3):413-24. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80046-1.
4
Serum bactericidal activity of extended-release clarithromycin against macrolide-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae.缓释克拉霉素对肺炎链球菌大环内酯类耐药菌株的血清杀菌活性
Pharmacotherapy. 2002 May;22(5):593-6. doi: 10.1592/phco.22.8.593.33214.
5
Susceptibility of twenty penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci to levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, erythromycin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin by MIC and time-kill.通过最低抑菌浓度(MIC)和时间杀菌曲线研究20株对青霉素敏感及耐药的肺炎球菌对左氧氟沙星、环丙沙星、氧氟沙星、红霉素、阿奇霉素和克拉霉素的敏感性。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1997 Jul;28(3):131-7. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(97)00017-5.
6
Antipneumococcal activities of two novel macrolides, GW 773546 and GW 708408, compared with those of erythromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, clindamycin, and telithromycin.两种新型大环内酯类药物GW 773546和GW 708408与红霉素、阿奇霉素、克拉霉素、克林霉素和泰利霉素相比的抗肺炎球菌活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004 Nov;48(11):4103-12. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.11.4103-4112.2004.
7
[Comparison of antimicrobial and bactericidal activities and postantibiotic effects of macrolides antibiotics against clinical isolates, and examination of shape alteration by scanning electron microscope].[大环内酯类抗生素对临床分离株的抗菌和杀菌活性及抗生素后效应比较,以及通过扫描电子显微镜检查形态改变]
Jpn J Antibiot. 2007 Feb;60(1):31-46.
8
Comparative activities of clarithromycin, erythromycin, and azithromycin against penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-resistant pneumococci.克拉霉素、红霉素和阿奇霉素对青霉素敏感及耐药肺炎球菌的比较活性
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Aug;40(8):1950-2. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.8.1950.
9
Influence of macrolide susceptibility on efficacies of clarithromycin and azithromycin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in a murine lung infection model.在小鼠肺部感染模型中,大环内酯类药物敏感性对克拉霉素和阿奇霉素抗肺炎链球菌疗效的影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Feb;47(2):739-46. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.2.739-746.2003.
10
Serum bactericidal activity of gemifloxacin versus clarithromycin against Streptococcus pneumoniae with different susceptibility to quinolones.吉米沙星与克拉霉素对不同喹诺酮敏感性肺炎链球菌的血清杀菌活性
J Chemother. 2004 Feb;16(1):56-61. doi: 10.1179/joc.2004.16.1.56.