Hoffman Holly L, Klepser Michael E, Ernst Erika J, Petzold C Rosemarie, Sa'adah Loai Mohammed, Doern Gary V
Colleges of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Feb;47(2):739-46. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.2.739-746.2003.
We evaluated the activities of clarithromycin and azithromycin against 19 isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae using a neutropenic lung infection model. The isolates included five susceptible isolates (clarithromycin and azithromycin MICs, </=0.12 micro g/ml), nine isolates exhibiting low-level, mefA-mediated resistance (clarithromycin and azithromycin MICs, 0.5 to 32 micro g/ml), and five isolates expressing high-level, ermB-mediated macrolide resistance (clarithromycin and azithromycin MICs, >/=64 micro g/ml). Infected mice were administered either saline (control), clarithromycin (4, 40, or 200 mg/kg of body weight twice daily or 200 mg/kg once daily), or azithromycin (4, 40, or 200 mg/kg once daily or 40 mg/kg twice daily) by oral gavage for 72 h. Mortality was assessed at regular intervals for 10 days, and survival in each group was compared to that of untreated controls. Animals infected with susceptible isolates demonstrated significant improvement in survival compared to the controls following treatment with either agent at doses of >/=40 mg/kg. In contrast, none of the regimens improved the survival of animals infected with isolates exhibiting high-level macrolide resistance. Among mice infected with strains expressing low-level resistance, significant improvement in survival compared to the controls was noted among isolates treated with clarithromycin at 40 (seven of nine isolates) and 200 (nine of nine isolates) mg/kg twice a day and with azithromycin at 40 (one of nine isolates) and 200 (three of nine isolates) mg/kg once a day. Animals infected with isolates of S. pneumoniae exhibiting low-level, mefA-mediated macrolide resistance responded to treatment with clarithromycin at rates similar to those observed among mice infected with fully susceptible isolates.
我们使用中性粒细胞减少的肺部感染模型评估了克拉霉素和阿奇霉素对19株肺炎链球菌的活性。这些分离株包括5株敏感株(克拉霉素和阿奇霉素的MICs,≤0.12μg/ml)、9株表现出低水平、mefA介导耐药性的分离株(克拉霉素和阿奇霉素的MICs,0.5至32μg/ml)以及5株表达高水平、ermB介导大环内酯耐药性的分离株(克拉霉素和阿奇霉素的MICs,≥64μg/ml)。感染小鼠通过口服灌胃给予生理盐水(对照)、克拉霉素(4、40或200mg/kg体重,每日两次或200mg/kg每日一次)或阿奇霉素(4、40或200mg/kg每日一次或40mg/kg每日两次),持续72小时。定期评估10天的死亡率,并将每组的存活率与未治疗的对照组进行比较。用≥40mg/kg剂量的任何一种药物治疗后,感染敏感分离株的动物存活率与对照组相比有显著改善。相比之下,没有一种方案能提高感染高水平大环内酯耐药分离株的动物的存活率。在感染表达低水平耐药菌株的小鼠中,与对照组相比,用40(9株中的7株)和200(9株中的9株)mg/kg每日两次的克拉霉素以及40(9株中的1株)和200(9株中的3株)mg/kg每日一次的阿奇霉素治疗的分离株存活率有显著改善。感染表现出低水平、mefA介导大环内酯耐药性的肺炎链球菌分离株的动物对克拉霉素治疗的反应率与感染完全敏感分离株的小鼠中观察到的反应率相似。