Müller U R
Medizinische Klinik, Zieglerspital, Bern, Schweiz.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2001 Apr;124(4):447-53. doi: 10.1159/000053779.
According to most textbooks, diagnostic tests with Hymenoptera venoms are reliable, and immunotherapy with these venoms in Hymenoptera-venom-allergic patients leads in near to 100% to full protection. Careful analysis of the literature shows however that the specificity of diagnostic tests is far from perfect and that both efficacy and tolerance, especially in patients receiving honeybee venom immunotherapy, are still suboptimal. The major allergens of honeybee and vespid venoms are now available in recombinant form. Preliminary trials analyzing diagnostic tests with recombinant allergens in honeybee venom allergy are promising: the specificity is clearly increased in both skin testing and in determining venom-specific IgE antibodies when compared to natural venom allergens. An important recent finding is the frequent association of severe Hymenoptera venom allergy and elevated basal serum levels of the mast-cell-specific enzyme tryptase. Elevated levels are found in up to 30% of the patients with a history of severe shock reactions following Hymenoptera stings. The current findings indicate that basal tryptase levels indicating an increased mast cell load are much more frequent than previously thought and are a risk factor for severe or even fatal sting reactions. Premedication with antihistamines in the initial phase of venom immunotherapy reduced both local and systemic allergic side effects in several controlled studies. In a retrospective analysis of one of these trials it was found that reexposure during immunotherapy resulted in significantly more systemic allergic reactions in patients on placebo than on antihistamine premedication, suggesting that initial antihistamine premedication might increase the efficacy of venom immunotherapy. Different ways of allergen modification for venom immunotherapy have been proposed. While the results with chemical modifications were not convincing, recent studies with T-cell epitope peptides from the major bee venom allergen phospholipase A(2) look promising. Patient-tailored cocktails of recombinant venom allergens or isoforms thereof may be another possibility in the future. A number of prospective studies analyzing the duration of venom immunotherapy required for long-term protection have been published in the last decade. While most patients are still fully protected 1 year after discontinuation of therapy, relapses may occur in up to 20% of patients reexposed many years after treatment. Various risk factors for such relapses have been identified.
根据大多数教科书,针对膜翅目毒液的诊断测试是可靠的,并且对膜翅目毒液过敏的患者使用这些毒液进行免疫治疗几乎能达到100%的完全保护效果。然而,对文献的仔细分析表明,诊断测试的特异性远非完美,而且疗效和耐受性,尤其是在接受蜜蜂毒液免疫治疗的患者中,仍不尽人意。蜜蜂和黄蜂毒液的主要过敏原现在已有重组形式。分析用重组过敏原对蜜蜂毒液过敏进行诊断测试的初步试验很有前景:与天然毒液过敏原相比,在皮肤试验和测定毒液特异性IgE抗体时,特异性均明显提高。最近一项重要发现是,严重膜翅目毒液过敏与肥大细胞特异性酶类胰蛋白酶的基础血清水平升高经常相关。在有膜翅目蜇伤后严重休克反应病史的患者中,高达30%的患者发现类胰蛋白酶水平升高。目前的研究结果表明,表明肥大细胞负荷增加的基础类胰蛋白酶水平比以前认为的更为常见,并且是严重甚至致命蜇伤反应的一个危险因素。在几项对照研究中,在毒液免疫治疗的初始阶段使用抗组胺药进行预处理可减少局部和全身过敏副作用。在对其中一项试验的回顾性分析中发现,在免疫治疗期间再次接触时,接受安慰剂治疗的患者比接受抗组胺药预处理的患者出现明显更多的全身过敏反应,这表明初始抗组胺药预处理可能会提高毒液免疫治疗的疗效。已经提出了毒液免疫治疗中过敏原修饰的不同方法。虽然化学修饰的结果并不令人信服,但最近对主要蜜蜂毒液过敏原磷脂酶A2的T细胞表位肽的研究看起来很有前景。未来,根据患者定制的重组毒液过敏原或其同工型混合物可能是另一种选择。在过去十年中,已经发表了一些分析长期保护所需毒液免疫治疗持续时间的前瞻性研究。虽然大多数患者在治疗停止1年后仍得到充分保护,但在治疗多年后再次接触的患者中,高达20%可能会复发。已经确定了此类复发的各种危险因素。