Lein M, Jung K, Hammerer P, Graefen M, Semjonow A, Stieber P, Ossendorf M, Luboldt H J, Brux B, Stephan C, Schnorr D, Loening S A
Department of Urology, University Hospital Charité, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
Prostate. 2001 May 1;47(2):77-84. doi: 10.1002/pros.1049.
The aim was to evaluate the clinical performance of alpha(1)-antichymotrypsin prostate-specific antigen (PSA-ACT) for early diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) in a multicenter trial.
Three hundred sixty-seven white men with PCa and 290 with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with tPSA concentrations between 2 and 20 microg/L were analyzed. The Elecsys system 2010 (Roche Diagnostics, Germany) was used for determination of total PSA (tPSA) and free PSA (fPSA). The PSA-ACT test was a prototype assay used on the ES system (Roche Diagnostics).
The median concentrations of tPSA (PCa: 8.43 microg/L vs. BPH: 6.60 microg/L) and PSA-ACT (8.30 microg/L vs. 6.46 microg/L) were significantly different, respectively. The median ratios of fPSA/tPSA (PCa: 12% vs. BPH: 16%) and PSA-ACT/tPSA (98% vs. 95%) were significantly different. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis for discrimination between PCa and BPH (tPSA between 2 and 20 microg/L) was performed with 252 matched pairs and showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of the ratio fPSA/tPSA (0.66) was significantly different from tPSA (0.50) and PSA-ACT (0.52). PSA-ACT alone or the ratio PSA-ACT/tPSA (0.56) were not significantly different from tPSA. For tPSA between 4 and 10 microg/L (n = 145 pairs), the AUC of the ratio fPSA/tPSA (0.65) was significantly higher than tPSA (0.50) and PSA-ACT (0.54). Significant differences between tPSA and PSA-ACT or PSA-ACT/tPSA (0.56) were not found.
The determination of PSA-ACT as well as the PSA-ACT/tPSA ratio did not improve the diagnostic impact in patients undergoing evaluation for PCa compared to fPSA/tPSA ratio.
本研究旨在通过一项多中心试验评估α1抗糜蛋白酶前列腺特异性抗原(PSA-ACT)在前列腺癌(PCa)早期诊断中的临床性能。
分析了367例tPSA浓度在2至20μg/L之间的PCa白人男性患者和290例良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者。使用Elecsys系统2010(德国罗氏诊断公司)测定总PSA(tPSA)和游离PSA(fPSA)。PSA-ACT检测是在ES系统(罗氏诊断公司)上使用的一种原型检测方法。
tPSA的中位数浓度(PCa:8.43μg/L vs. BPH:6.60μg/L)和PSA-ACT的中位数浓度(8.30μg/L vs. 6.46μg/L)分别有显著差异。fPSA/tPSA的中位数比值(PCa:12% vs. BPH:16%)和PSA-ACT/tPSA的中位数比值(98% vs. 95%)有显著差异。对252对匹配病例进行了区分PCa和BPH(tPSA在2至20μg/L之间)的受试者工作特征(ROC)分析,结果显示fPSA/tPSA比值的曲线下面积(AUC)(0.66)与tPSA(0.50)和PSA-ACT(0.52)有显著差异。单独的PSA-ACT或PSA-ACT/tPSA比值(0.56)与tPSA无显著差异。对于tPSA在4至10μg/L之间(n = 145对)的情况,fPSA/tPSA比值的AUC(0.65)显著高于tPSA(0.50)和PSA-ACT(0.54)。未发现tPSA与PSA-ACT或PSA-ACT/tPSA(0.56)之间有显著差异。
与fPSA/tPSA比值相比,测定PSA-ACT以及PSA-ACT/tPSA比值并未提高对接受PCa评估患者的诊断效果。