Suppr超能文献

存储磷光体射线照片与数字平板探测器图像的低对比度细节感知比较。

Comparison of low-contrast detail perception on storage phosphor radiographs and digital flat panel detector images.

作者信息

Peer S, Neitzel U, Giacomuzzi S M, Peer R, Gassner E, Steingruber I, Jaschke W

出版信息

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001 Mar;20(3):239-42. doi: 10.1109/42.918474.

Abstract

A contrast detail analysis was performed to compare perception of low-contrast details on X-ray images derived from digital storage phosphor radiography and from a flat panel detector system based on a cesium iodide/amorphous silicon matrix. The CDRAD 2.0 phantom was used to perform a comparative contrast detail analysis of a clinical storage phosphor radiography system and an indirect type digital flat panel detector unit. Images were acquired at exposure levels comparable to film speeds of 50/100/200/400 and 800. Four observers evaluated a total of 50 films with respect to the threshold contrast for each detail size. The numbers of correctly identified objects were determined for all image subsets. The overall results show that low-contrast detail perception with digital flat panel detector images is better than with state of the art storage phosphor screens. This is especially true for the low-exposure setting, where a nearly 10% higher correct observation ratio is reached. Given its high detective quantum efficiency the digital flat panel technology based on the cesium iodide scintillator/amorphous silicon matrix is best suited for detection of low-contrast detail structures, which shows its high potential for clinical imaging.

摘要

进行了一项对比细节分析,以比较数字存储磷光体射线照相术和基于碘化铯/非晶硅矩阵的平板探测器系统所产生的X射线图像上低对比度细节的感知情况。使用CDRAD 2.0体模对临床存储磷光体射线照相系统和间接型数字平板探测器单元进行对比细节分析。在与50/100/200/400和800的胶片速度相当的曝光水平下采集图像。四名观察者针对每个细节尺寸的阈值对比度对总共50张胶片进行了评估。确定了所有图像子集正确识别物体的数量。总体结果表明,数字平板探测器图像的低对比度细节感知优于现有技术的存储磷光屏。在低曝光设置下尤其如此,此时正确观察率提高了近10%。基于碘化铯闪烁体/非晶硅矩阵的数字平板技术因其高探测量子效率,最适合检测低对比度细节结构,这显示了其在临床成像中的巨大潜力。

相似文献

6
Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;117(1-3):174-7. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nci748. Epub 2006 Feb 3.
9
Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography.
Radiology. 2001 Mar;218(3):683-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.218.3.r01fe45683.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Image quality and radiation dose in planar imaging - Image quality figure of merits from the CDRAD phantom.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Jul;20(7):151-159. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12649. Epub 2019 Jun 1.
2
Modeling the performance characteristics of computed radiography (CR) systems.
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Mar;29(3):790-806. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2009.2036995.
3
Digital chest radiography: an update on modern technology, dose containment and control of image quality.
Eur Radiol. 2008 Sep;18(9):1818-30. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-0948-3. Epub 2008 Apr 23.
4
Direct detector radiography versus dual reading computed radiography: feasibility of dose reduction in chest radiography.
Eur Radiol. 2006 Jul;16(7):1544-50. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-0077-1. Epub 2006 Jan 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验