Mitchell I D, Croal B L, Dickie A, Cohen N P, Ross I
Department of Urology, Grampian University Hospitals Trust and Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
J Urol. 2001 May;165(5):1549-53.
Patients are increasingly undergoing prostatic biopsy to identify localized prostate cancer. The decision to perform a biopsy is often made on the basis of total prostate specific antigen (PSA). However, this value lacks adequate specificity for this task. We evaluate the role that a number of these tests, including the Bayer complexed PSA (Bayer Diagnostics, Tarrytown, New York) and free/total PSA ratio, may have in our clinical practice.
A total of 160 consecutive patients attending a prostate assessment clinic were enrolled during an 18-month period in our study. All patients had a previously recorded total PSA (range 2.6 to 20.0 ng./ml.). Before transrectal ultrasound biopsy of the prostate gland, a blood sample was taken with patient consent. The findings on ultrasound were then recorded, including prostate volume. Serum samples were immediately sent for subsequent storage and analysis.
Of the patients enrolled 109 had benign histology while 51 had prostatic carcinoma. The 2 patient groups were well matched for age. In our series patients with prostate cancer had significantly smaller prostates and higher mean total PSA. At a high sensitivity, such as 95%, it appeared that Bayer complexed PSA performed better than the other tests and ratios, with an estimated specificity of 24.8% compared with 17.4% for Bayer total PSA and 15.6% for Abbott free/total PSA (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois). Receiver operator characteristics curves were drawn, and when the areas under them were calculated, we demonstrated that the area under the curve for Bayer complexed PSA (0.706) was between the values for total PSA (0.671) and free/total PSA ratio (0.731). However, the only statistically significant improvement in performance was in Bayer complexed PSA over the total PSA assays.
Our study revealed that the overall diagnostic performance of Bayer complexed PSA appears to be better than the other PSA tests and ratios studied. The use of Bayer complexed PSA may lead to a reduction in the number of men undergoing unnecessary prostatic biopsy.
越来越多的患者接受前列腺活检以确定局限性前列腺癌。进行活检的决定通常基于总前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)。然而,该值在这项任务中缺乏足够的特异性。我们评估了包括拜耳复合PSA(拜耳诊断公司,纽约塔里敦)和游离/总PSA比值在内的多项检测在我们临床实践中的作用。
在18个月的时间里,我们研究共纳入了160名连续到前列腺评估门诊就诊的患者。所有患者之前都记录有总PSA(范围为2.6至20.0 ng/ml)。在经直肠超声引导下进行前列腺活检前,经患者同意采集血样。然后记录超声检查结果,包括前列腺体积。血清样本立即送检以便后续储存和分析。
纳入的患者中,109例组织学检查为良性,51例患有前列腺癌。两组患者年龄匹配良好。在我们的系列研究中,前列腺癌患者的前列腺明显较小,平均总PSA较高。在高敏感性(如95%)时,似乎拜耳复合PSA的表现优于其他检测和比值,估计特异性为24.8%,而拜耳总PSA为17.4%,雅培游离/总PSA比值为15.6%(雅培实验室,伊利诺伊州雅培公园)。绘制了受试者操作特征曲线,计算曲线下面积时,我们发现拜耳复合PSA的曲线下面积(0.706)介于总PSA(0.671)和游离/总PSA比值(0.731)之间。然而,在性能上唯一具有统计学意义的改善是拜耳复合PSA相对于总PSA检测。
我们的研究表明,拜耳复合PSA的总体诊断性能似乎优于所研究的其他PSA检测和比值。使用拜耳复合PSA可能会减少接受不必要前列腺活检的男性数量。