Stamey T A, Yemoto C E
Department of Urology, Stanford University, School of Medicine, California 94305, USA.
J Urol. 2000 Jan;163(1):119-26.
We evaluated the relative usefulness of total, free and complexed serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), and their ratios for distinguishing positive from negative biopsy of prostates in a university referral practice.
We compared 90 consecutive men who had 2 sets of 6 negative systematic biopsies with 70 who had at least 5 mm. of prostate cancer in systematic biopsies during the same period at our institution. Total prostate and transition zone volumes were determined by transrectal ultrasound. The Bayer, DPC and Hybritech assays were performed to measure total, free and complexed serum PSA. Receiver operating characteristics curves were constructed for all forms of serum PSA and their ratios as well as prostate size to distinguish true positive (sensitivity) from false-positive (1 minus specificity) fractions.
Complexed PSA was only marginally better than total serum PSA. Free-to-total, complexed-to-total and prostate size had highly significant areas under the curves of greater than 80%. Free PSA only was better than complexed or total PSA. When factored by prostate volume, total PSA performed as well as the PSA ratios, and transition zone volume was consistently better than total prostate volume. DPC free-to-total ratios were equivalent to Hybritech ratios in all respects.
Complexed PSA is only marginally better than total PSA for distinguishing negative from positive biopsy of prostates. It is inferior to free PSA and far less useful than free-to-total or complexed-to-total ratios. Prostate size is a decisive variable in men in whom we avoided the expected 25% false-negative biopsy rate in terms of specificity and hopefully avoided insignificant cancer in terms of sensitivity. In the future the performance of PSA serum markers should be related to a transition zone volume of less than 20, 20 to 60 and greater than 60 gm. when comparing assays to each other.
在一家大学转诊机构中,我们评估了总血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、游离PSA和复合PSA及其比值在鉴别前列腺活检结果为阳性或阴性方面的相对效用。
我们将90例连续接受两组共6次阴性系统性活检的男性与同期在本机构接受系统性活检且至少有5毫米前列腺癌的70例男性进行了比较。经直肠超声测定前列腺总体积和移行区体积。采用拜耳、DPC和海布里奇检测法测量总血清PSA、游离PSA和复合PSA。构建所有形式血清PSA及其比值以及前列腺大小的受试者操作特征曲线,以区分真阳性(敏感性)和假阳性(1减去特异性)比例。
复合PSA仅略优于总血清PSA。游离PSA与总PSA的比值、复合PSA与总PSA的比值以及前列腺大小的曲线下面积均高度显著大于80%。仅游离PSA优于复合PSA或总PSA。按前列腺体积进行分析时,总PSA的表现与PSA比值相当,移行区体积始终优于前列腺总体积。DPC游离PSA与总PSA的比值在各方面均与海布里奇检测法的比值相当。
在鉴别前列腺活检结果为阴性或阳性方面,复合PSA仅略优于总PSA。它不如游离PSA,且远不如游离PSA与总PSA的比值或复合PSA与总PSA的比值有用。前列腺大小是一个决定性变量,对于这类男性,我们在特异性方面避免了预期的25%假阴性活检率,在敏感性方面有望避免微小癌。未来在相互比较检测方法时,PSA血清标志物的表现应与移行区体积小于20克、20至60克以及大于60克的情况相关。