Goldberg A, Confino-Cohen R
Allergy and Clinical Immunology Unit, Meir General Hospital, Kfar Saba, Israel.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 May;107(5):902-6. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.114986.
Maintenance venom immunotherapy (MVIT) is usually administered to patients with venom allergy at 4- to 6-week intervals for at least 3 to 5 years. The small number of studies assessing the possibility of extending the maintenance interval (MI) included either too small a population and patients with only vespid and not bee venom (BV) allergy or relied on reaction to field stings only.
We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of MVIT given at 3-month intervals to a large population of patients allergic to both yellow jacket venom and BV.
In all patients undergoing venom immunotherapy, MI was gradually extended to 3 months. Systemic reactions (SRs) to immunotherapy injections or to field stings were regularly recorded. Some of the patients were also deliberately sting challenged during the 3-month interval. Patients discontinuing MVIT were interviewed regarding their responses to field re-stings, and in some of them, an in-hospital sting challenge was performed.
One hundred sixty patients mostly allergic to BV were enrolled in the study. Failure to reach the 3-month interval was observed in 6 (3.8%) patients, originating in failure to reach the full maintenance dose in most of them. SRs to MVIT administered at 3-month intervals were observed in 2.6% of the patients. One of 36 patients who experienced a field sting during the 3-month interval had an objective mild SR (2.8%). Two (4.5%) of 44 patients who were deliberately stung during the 3-month interval had mild SRs. After discontinuation of MVIT, 2 (8.3%) of 24 patients who experienced a field sting had an SR. Both were allergic to yellow jacket venom. Three to 82 months after discontinuation of MVIT, 22 patients allergic to BV were sting challenged. Only one (4.5%) patient had a mild objective SR.
The conventional 4- to 6-week MI can easily be extended to 3 months in most patients without any adverse events. MVIT given at a 3-month interval is safe and effective while being administered, as well as after its discontinuation. This fact should be applied to almost every patient allergic to insect venom.
维持性毒液免疫疗法(MVIT)通常以4至6周的间隔给予毒液过敏患者,持续至少3至5年。少数评估延长维持间隔(MI)可能性的研究,要么纳入的人群规模过小,要么研究对象仅为对黄蜂毒液过敏而非蜜蜂毒液(BV)过敏的患者,或者仅依赖对野外蜇伤的反应。
我们旨在评估对大量对黄蜂毒液和BV均过敏的患者每3个月进行一次MVIT的安全性和有效性。
在所有接受毒液免疫疗法的患者中,MI逐渐延长至3个月。定期记录免疫疗法注射或野外蜇伤后的全身反应(SRs)。部分患者在3个月间隔期内还接受了故意蜇刺激发试验。对停止MVIT的患者就其对野外再次蜇伤的反应进行访谈,部分患者还进行了院内蜇刺激发试验。
160名大多对BV过敏的患者纳入本研究。6名(3.8%)患者未达到3个月的间隔,大多数原因是未达到完全维持剂量。每3个月进行一次MVIT时,2.6%的患者出现SRs。在3个月间隔期内经历野外蜇伤的36名患者中,1名出现客观轻度SR(2.8%)。在3个月间隔期内接受故意蜇刺的44名患者中,2名(4.5%)出现轻度SRs。停止MVIT后,经历野外蜇伤的24名患者中有2名(8.3%)出现SRs。二者均对黄蜂毒液过敏。停止MVIT后3至82个月,22名对BV过敏的患者接受蜇刺激发试验。仅1名(4.5%)患者出现轻度客观SR。
在大多数患者中,常规的4至6周MI可轻松延长至3个月,且无任何不良事件。每3个月进行一次的MVIT在给药期间以及停药后均安全有效。这一事实应适用于几乎所有对昆虫毒液过敏的患者。