• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[小儿门诊患者丙泊酚麻醉的恢复特征;与七氟醚麻醉的比较]

[Recovery characteristics of propofol anesthesia in pediatric outpatients; comparison with sevoflurane anesthesia].

作者信息

Kubo S, Kinouchi K, Taniguchi A, Fukumitsu K, Kitamura S

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka Medical Center and Research Institute for Maternal and Child Health, Izumi 594-1101.

出版信息

Masui. 2001 Apr;50(4):371-7.

PMID:11345748
Abstract

We compared recovery characteristics of propofol anesthesia with those of sevoflurane anesthesia in pediatric outpatients. One hundred and four children, 3 months to 6 years of age, ASA physical status 1 or 2, were randomly assigned to following four groups; sevoflurane (group S), propofol (group P), sevoflurane with premedication (group MS), or propofol with premedication (group MP). Midazolam 0.5 mg.kg-1 and famotidine 1 mg.kg-1 were administered orally 30 min before the induction in the MS and MP group. Recovery from anesthesia, agitation, and postoperative pain were evaluated. The time intervals from the end of surgery to extubation and to discharge from the hospital were recorded. The incidence of vomiting and use of analgesic drugs were also checked. The emergence from anesthesia was slower with propofol anesthesia than with sevoflurane anesthesia, but the time to discharge from the hospital was not significantly different among the four groups. Incidence of agitation was higher in S group compared with P group, but there were no differences between MS and MP. Postoperative pain was similar among the four groups. There were no differences in the incidence of vomiting. Propofol anesthesia provided slower emergence and less agitation compared with sevoflurane anesthesia.

摘要

我们比较了小儿门诊患者丙泊酚麻醉与七氟醚麻醉的恢复特征。104名3个月至6岁、ASA身体状况为1或2的儿童被随机分为以下四组:七氟醚组(S组)、丙泊酚组(P组)、术前用药的七氟醚组(MS组)或术前用药的丙泊酚组(MP组)。MS组和MP组在诱导前30分钟口服咪达唑仑0.5mg·kg-1和法莫替丁1mg·kg-1。评估麻醉恢复、躁动和术后疼痛情况。记录从手术结束到拔管以及出院的时间间隔。还检查呕吐发生率和镇痛药的使用情况。丙泊酚麻醉的苏醒比七氟醚麻醉慢,但四组之间的出院时间无显著差异。S组的躁动发生率高于P组,但MS组和MP组之间无差异。四组术后疼痛情况相似。呕吐发生率无差异。与七氟醚麻醉相比,丙泊酚麻醉苏醒较慢且躁动较少。

相似文献

1
[Recovery characteristics of propofol anesthesia in pediatric outpatients; comparison with sevoflurane anesthesia].[小儿门诊患者丙泊酚麻醉的恢复特征;与七氟醚麻醉的比较]
Masui. 2001 Apr;50(4):371-7.
2
Midazolam premedication delays recovery from propofol-induced sevoflurane anesthesia in children 1-3 yr.咪达唑仑术前用药会延迟1至3岁儿童丙泊酚诱导的七氟醚麻醉后的苏醒。
Can J Anaesth. 1999 Aug;46(8):766-71. doi: 10.1007/BF03013912.
3
Prophylactic use of midazolam or propofol at the end of surgery may reduce the incidence of emergence agitation after sevoflurane anaesthesia.手术结束时预防性使用咪达唑仑或丙泊酚可能会降低七氟醚麻醉后苏醒期躁动的发生率。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011 Sep;39(5):904-8. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1103900516.
4
Transition to propofol after sevoflurane anesthesia to prevent emergence agitation: a randomized controlled trial.七氟醚麻醉后转换为丙泊酚以预防苏醒期躁动:一项随机对照试验。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 May;25(5):517-23. doi: 10.1111/pan.12617. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
5
Propofol reduces the incidence of emergence agitation in preschool-aged children as well as in school-aged children: a comparison with sevoflurane.丙泊酚可降低学龄前儿童和学龄儿童苏醒期躁动的发生率:与七氟醚的比较。
J Anesth. 2007;21(1):19-23. doi: 10.1007/s00540-006-0466-x. Epub 2007 Jan 30.
6
Sevoflurane-maintained anesthesia induced with propofol or sevoflurane in small children: induction and recovery characteristics.丙泊酚或七氟醚诱导用于小儿七氟醚维持麻醉:诱导和恢复特征
Can J Anaesth. 1999 Jan;46(1):21-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03012509.
7
Comparison of sevoflurane and halothane anesthesia in children undergoing outpatient ear, nose, and throat surgery.七氟烷与氟烷用于小儿门诊耳鼻喉手术麻醉的比较。
J Clin Anesth. 1995 Aug;7(5):398-402. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(95)00071-o.
8
A comparison: the efficacy of sevoflurane-nitrous oxide or propofol-nitrous oxide for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia.一项比较:七氟醚-氧化亚氮或丙泊酚-氧化亚氮用于全身麻醉诱导和维持的疗效。
J Clin Anesth. 1996 Dec;8(8):639-43. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(96)00172-9.
9
Emergence agitation after sevoflurane versus propofol in pediatric patients.小儿患者中七氟醚与丙泊酚麻醉后苏醒期躁动的比较
Anesth Analg. 2000 Sep;91(3):563-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200009000-00012.
10
The comparative effects of sevoflurane versus propofol in the induction and maintenance of anesthesia in adult patients.七氟醚与丙泊酚对成年患者麻醉诱导和维持的比较效果。
Anesth Analg. 1996 Mar;82(3):479-85. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199603000-00009.

引用本文的文献

1
The Safety of Propofol Versus Sevoflurane for General Anesthesia in Children: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.丙泊酚与七氟醚用于儿童全身麻醉的安全性:随机对照试验的Meta分析
Front Surg. 2022 Jun 22;9:924647. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.924647. eCollection 2022.
2
Emergence agitation in children: risk factors, prevention, and treatment.儿童苏醒期躁动:危险因素、预防及治疗
J Anesth. 2016 Apr;30(2):261-7. doi: 10.1007/s00540-015-2098-5. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
3
Effects of sevoflurane versus other general anaesthesia on emergence agitation in children.
七氟醚与其他全身麻醉对儿童苏醒期躁动的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 12;2014(9):CD007084. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007084.pub2.
4
Intravenous versus inhalational anaesthesia for paediatric outpatient surgery.小儿门诊手术的静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 7;2014(2):CD009015. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009015.pub2.
5
Lower incidence of emergence agitation in children after propofol anesthesia compared with sevoflurane: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.与七氟醚相比,丙泊酚麻醉后儿童苏醒期躁动发生率较低:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Anesth. 2014 Feb;28(1):4-11. doi: 10.1007/s00540-013-1656-y. Epub 2013 Jun 26.