Suppr超能文献

七氟烷与氟烷用于小儿门诊耳鼻喉手术麻醉的比较。

Comparison of sevoflurane and halothane anesthesia in children undergoing outpatient ear, nose, and throat surgery.

作者信息

Greenspun J C, Hannallah R S, Welborn L G, Norden J M

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, D.C. 20010, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 1995 Aug;7(5):398-402. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(95)00071-o.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the induction, maintenance, and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane and halothane in pediatric ambulatory patients undergoing adenoidectomy with or without myringotomies (BMTs). To compare the hemodynamic effects of the two drugs.

DESIGN

Open, randomized study.

SETTING

University-affiliated pediatric hospital.

PATIENTS

39 ASA physical status I children aged 12 months to 12 years undergoing adenoidectomies with or without BMTs.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to receive sevoflurane or halothane in 60% nitrous oxide (N2O) for induction and maintenance of anesthesia. All patients received midazolam 0.5 mg/kg orally as premedication, as well as fentanyl 1 mcg/kg intravenously (i.v.) immediately following induction. Tracheal intubation was facilitated with mivacurium 0.2 mg/kg i.v. Anesthesia was maintained with an end-tidal concentration corresponding to 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of each drug until the end of surgery, at which time all anesthetic gases were discontinued simultaneously. Emergence (extubation), recovery (Steward score = 6), and discharge times were compared among patients in both groups. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure were compared at predetermined intervals. Additional fentanyl was administered after full recovery was documented for an objective pain score of at least 6.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Emergence from anesthesia was significantly faster (7.11 +/- 3.05 minutes vs. 9.58 +/- 5.12 minutes) and recovery (19.89 +/- 10.07 minutes vs. 31.08 +/- 9.81 minutes) more rapid in the sevoflurane group. However, there was no difference in the time to meet home discharge criteria (184 +/- 49 minutes vs. 189 +/- 48 minutes). HR was consistently maintained at or above baseline in the sevoflurane group. Blood pressure was significantly more depressed after fentanyl administration in the halothane group. There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative vomiting between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Sevoflurane provides a faster anesthetic emergence and recovery than halothane in premedicated patients but it does not expedite meeting current home discharge criteria.

摘要

研究目的

比较七氟醚和氟烷在接受或未接受鼓膜切开术(BMT)的儿科门诊腺样体切除术患者中的诱导、维持和恢复特征。比较两种药物的血流动力学效应。

设计

开放性随机研究。

地点

大学附属医院。

患者

39例年龄在12个月至12岁之间、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为I级、接受或未接受BMT的腺样体切除术患儿。

干预措施

患者随机接受七氟醚或氟烷与60%氧化亚氮(N2O)混合用于麻醉诱导和维持。所有患者术前口服咪达唑仑0.5mg/kg,诱导后立即静脉注射(i.v.)芬太尼1μg/kg。静脉注射米库氯铵0.2mg/kg辅助气管插管。每种药物以呼气末浓度相当于1个最低肺泡浓度(MAC)维持麻醉直至手术结束,此时所有麻醉气体同时停止使用。比较两组患者的苏醒(拔管)、恢复(Steward评分=6)和出院时间。在预定时间间隔比较心率(HR)和平均动脉压。在记录到完全恢复且客观疼痛评分为至少6分时给予额外的芬太尼。

测量指标和主要结果

七氟醚组的麻醉苏醒明显更快(7.11±3.05分钟对9.58±5.12分钟),恢复也更快(19.89±10.07分钟对31.08±9.81分钟)。然而,达到出院标准的时间没有差异(184±49分钟对189±48分钟)。七氟醚组的HR始终维持在基线或高于基线水平。氟烷组在给予芬太尼后血压明显更低。两组术后呕吐发生率无显著差异。

结论

在使用术前用药的患者中,七氟醚比氟烷提供更快的麻醉苏醒和恢复,但它并不能加快达到当前出院标准的速度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验