Tanser S J, Birt D J
Derriford Hospital.
J R Nav Med Serv. 2000;86(3):134-41.
The aim of National Anaesthesia Day on 25 May 2000 was to inform the public about the role and training of anaesthetists. We carried out two surveys of patients attending Derriford Hospital, Plymouth to assess the local impact of National Anaesthesia Day and to assess the public's expectation of the preoperative visit. The first survey was held one month prior to National Anaesthesia Day and was completed by 93 patients. The second survey was held immediately following National Anaesthesia Day and was completed by 70 patients. Thirty five percent of the patients surveyed were unaware that anaesthetists were medically qualified. This result was not altered by National Anaesthesia Day despite a local information campaign. Moreover, knowledge about our role and training was only marginally improved from 1978. The majority of patients expected to see their anaesthetist preoperatively for less than 10 minutes and would not be concerned if they had not been seen one hour before surgery. Style of clothing was unimportant; few preferred a white coat but name badges were desirable. We conclude that the level of ignorance about our profession has not changed since 1978 and the impact of National Anaesthesia Day was not significant. This may be as a result of the anaesthetist's portrayal on television, which is known to be an important source of public information on other areas of medicine. If these statistics are to change in the next 22 years new methods of public education need to be found.
2000年5月25日全国麻醉日的目的是让公众了解麻醉师的职责和培训情况。我们对普利茅斯德里福德医院的患者进行了两项调查,以评估全国麻醉日在当地的影响,并评估公众对术前访视的期望。第一次调查在全国麻醉日之前一个月进行,93名患者完成了调查。第二次调查在全国麻醉日之后立即进行,70名患者完成了调查。35%的受访患者不知道麻醉师具有医学资质。尽管开展了当地宣传活动,但全国麻醉日并未改变这一结果。此外,自1978年以来,关于我们职责和培训的了解仅略有改善。大多数患者期望术前见到麻醉师的时间少于10分钟,并且如果在手术前一小时没有见到麻醉师也不会在意。着装风格并不重要;很少有人喜欢白大褂,但姓名徽章是受欢迎的。我们得出结论,自1978年以来,公众对我们职业的无知程度没有改变,全国麻醉日的影响并不显著。这可能是由于电视上对麻醉师的刻画,众所周知,电视是公众获取其他医学领域信息的重要来源。如果这些统计数据在未来22年要有所改变,就需要找到新的公众教育方法。