Deusch E, Weber T, Libal G, Christian L, Ofner C
Klinik für Anästhesie und Allgemeine Intensivmedizin, Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck.
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1996 Sep;31(7):409-13. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995949.
In two Austrian university hospitals 104 patients were interviewed on the basis of questionnaires about their knowledge of the role of anaesthetists. Although 93% of the Patients considered anaesthesists to be physicians, major deficits were found regarding the knowledge about the spheres of activities of anaesthetists. 60% of the respondents confined the anaesthetist to the operating theatre. Only 55% considered the anaesthetist responsible for their safe recovery from anaesthesia. Previous anaesthesia showed to have no influence on the knowledge of anaesthesia practice and the role of anaesthetists. To current practice of informing the patient calls for improvement and new approaches. In addition to this further evaluation work on the influence of the mass media and public knowledge about anaesthesia and the anaesthetists' role should be undertaken.
在奥地利的两家大学医院,通过问卷调查对104名患者就其对麻醉医生角色的了解情况进行了访谈。尽管93%的患者认为麻醉医生是医生,但在麻醉医生的活动范围方面的知识存在重大欠缺。60%的受访者将麻醉医生的工作局限于手术室。只有55%的人认为麻醉医生对其从麻醉中安全苏醒负责。既往的麻醉经历显示对麻醉实践知识及麻醉医生的角色并无影响。目前告知患者的做法需要改进并采用新方法。此外,应就大众媒体的影响以及公众对麻醉和麻醉医生角色的了解开展进一步的评估工作。