• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺钼靶隐匿性乳腺癌

Mammographically Occult Breast Cancers.

作者信息

Tartter Paul Ian, Weiss Stephanie, Ahmed Sharmila, Kamath Shuba, Hermann George, Drossman Susan

机构信息

Departments of Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York; Departments of Radiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

Breast J. 1999 Jan;5(1):22-25. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.1999.005001022.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1524-4741.1999.005001022.x
PMID:11348251
Abstract

A small percentage of breast cancers are not visible on mammography. Since mammographically occult malignancies may be more difficult to diagnose, we hypothesized that the lack of visualization would cause a delay in detection, more aggressive surgical and adjuvant therapy, and poorer outcome. Patients with mammographically occult malignancies were compared to patients with cancers visible on mammogram. The significance of mammographic visibility for treatment and local and distant recurrence rates were evaluated. Ninety-one of the 813 (11%) cancers were mammographically occult. Patients with mammographically occult malignancies were significantly younger, of lower body weight, and had fewer pregnancies than patients with cancers visible on mammography: age, body weight, and parity were statistically significant (p < 0.001) in stepwise logistic regression. Ductal carcinoma in situ was significantly more frequently diagnosed in patients with mammographically visible malignancies (14% versus 4%, p = 0.0163) and nodal involvement was significantly more frequent in patients with mammographically occult malignancies (35% versus 24%, p = 0.0391). Diagnostic delays exceeding 3 months were experienced by 24% of patients with mammographically occult malignancies compared to 13% of patients with tumor visible on mammography (p < 0.0001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 63% of patients with occult malignancies compared to 41% of patients with mammographically visible cancers (p = 0.0027). The use of breast-conserving therapy and adjuvant radiation and tamoxifen were comparable. Survival free of local recurrence and distant metastases for the 403 patients followed for 5 years or more was not related to mammographic visibility.

摘要

一小部分乳腺癌在乳房X线摄影中不可见。由于乳房X线摄影隐匿性恶性肿瘤可能更难诊断,我们推测缺乏可视化会导致检测延迟、更积极的手术和辅助治疗以及更差的预后。将乳房X线摄影隐匿性恶性肿瘤患者与乳房X线摄影可见癌症患者进行比较。评估乳房X线摄影可见性对治疗以及局部和远处复发率的意义。813例癌症中有91例(11%)在乳房X线摄影中隐匿。乳房X线摄影隐匿性恶性肿瘤患者比乳房X线摄影可见癌症患者明显更年轻、体重更低且怀孕次数更少:在逐步逻辑回归中,年龄、体重和产次具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。乳房X线摄影可见恶性肿瘤患者原位导管癌的诊断频率明显更高(14%对4%,p = 0.0163),而乳房X线摄影隐匿性恶性肿瘤患者淋巴结受累明显更频繁(35%对24%,p = 0.0391)。乳房X线摄影隐匿性恶性肿瘤患者中有24%经历了超过3个月的诊断延迟,而乳房X线摄影可见肿瘤患者中这一比例为13%(p<0.0001)。63%的隐匿性恶性肿瘤患者接受了辅助化疗,而乳房X线摄影可见癌症患者中这一比例为41%(p = 0.0027)。保乳治疗、辅助放疗和他莫昔芬的使用情况相当。对403例随访5年或更长时间的患者进行的无局部复发和远处转移生存分析与乳房X线摄影可见性无关。

相似文献

1
Mammographically Occult Breast Cancers.乳腺钼靶隐匿性乳腺癌
Breast J. 1999 Jan;5(1):22-25. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.1999.005001022.x.
2
Mammographically detected, clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation.经乳房钼靶检查发现、临床隐匿的导管原位癌,采用保乳手术及根治性乳房放疗进行治疗。
Cancer J Sci Am. 1996 May-Jun;2(3):158-65.
3
Prognosis for mammographically occult, early-stage breast cancer patients treated with breast-conservation therapy.保乳治疗的隐匿性早期乳腺癌患者的预后。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Jan 1;76(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.01.039.
4
Mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated with breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation: long-term outcome and prognostic significance of patient age and margin status.经乳房保留手术及根治性乳房放疗治疗的乳腺钼靶检测原位导管癌:患者年龄及切缘状态的长期结局和预后意义
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Jul 15;50(4):991-1002. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01517-6.
5
Mammographically occult breast cancer. A pathologic and radiologic study.乳腺钼靶隐匿性乳腺癌。一项病理学与放射学研究。
Cancer. 1983 Nov 15;52(10):1810-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19831115)52:10<1810::aid-cncr2820521009>3.0.co;2-f.
6
Salvage treatment for local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery and radiation as initial treatment for mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.保乳手术和放疗作为乳腺钼靶检测到的乳腺导管原位癌的初始治疗后局部复发的挽救性治疗。
Cancer. 2001 Mar 15;91(6):1090-7.
7
Visibility of mammographically occult breast cancer on diffusion-weighted MRI versus ultrasound.乳腺钼靶隐匿性乳腺癌在扩散加权磁共振成像与超声检查中的可视性
Clin Imaging. 2018 May-Jun;49:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.10.017. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
8
Mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ treated with conservative surgery with or without radiation therapy: patterns of failure and 10-year results.接受保乳手术加或不加放射治疗的乳腺钼靶检测原位导管癌:失败模式及10年结果
Ann Surg. 2000 Feb;231(2):235-45. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200002000-00013.
9
Mammographically occult breast cancers detected with AI-based diagnosis supporting software: clinical and histopathologic characteristics.使用基于人工智能的诊断支持软件检测出的乳腺钼靶隐匿性乳腺癌:临床和组织病理学特征
Insights Imaging. 2022 Mar 26;13(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01183-x.
10
Results of conservative surgery and radiation for mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).乳腺钼靶检测到的导管原位癌(DCIS)的保守手术及放疗结果。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 Jul 15;38(5):949-57. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00153-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Occult breast cancer in an older woman: A case report.老年女性隐匿性乳腺癌:一例病例报告。
Exp Ther Med. 2024 Dec 24;29(2):38. doi: 10.3892/etm.2024.12788. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Mammographically occult breast cancers detected with AI-based diagnosis supporting software: clinical and histopathologic characteristics.使用基于人工智能的诊断支持软件检测出的乳腺钼靶隐匿性乳腺癌:临床和组织病理学特征
Insights Imaging. 2022 Mar 26;13(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01183-x.
3
Errors in Mammography Cannot be Solved Through Technology Alone.
乳腺摄影中的错误不能仅通过技术来解决。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Feb 26;19(2):291-301. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.2.291.