Suppr超能文献

胼胝体的性别差异:MRI形态测量学中的方法学考量

Sexual dimorphism in the corpus callosum: methodological considerations in MRI morphometry.

作者信息

Bermudez P, Zatorre R J

机构信息

Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, 3801 University Street, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2B4, Canada.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2001 Jun;13(6 Pt 1):1121-30. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0772.

Abstract

Studies of sexual dimorphism in the corpus callosum (CC) have employed a variety of methodologies for measurement and normalization but have yielded disparate results. The present work demonstrates how in some cases different manipulations of the same raw data, corresponding to different commonly used methodologies, produce discordant results. Midsagittal CC area was measured from magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of 137 young normal volunteers. Three strategies intended to normalize for average differences in brain size between the sexes, as well as five different normalization variables, were contrasted and evaluated. The stereotaxic method normalizes for intersubject differences in overall brain size by scaling MRIs into a standardized space. The ratio method uses one of five different indices of brain size and divides it into CC area. The covariate method uses one of the indices as a covariate in statistical analyses. Male subjects show significantly larger absolute total area, as well as anterior third and posterior midbody. However, in two of three normalization strategies, namely the stereotaxic and ratio methods, females show relatively larger total area, anterior midbody, and splenium. The covariate method did not show any significant differences at the 0.05 level. Results suggest that different approaches to normalization and analysis are not necessarily equivalent and interchangeable.

摘要

关于胼胝体(CC)性二态性的研究采用了多种测量和标准化方法,但结果却各不相同。本研究表明,在某些情况下,对相同原始数据进行不同的处理(对应不同的常用方法)会产生不一致的结果。从137名年轻正常志愿者的磁共振成像(MRI)中测量了正中矢状面CC区域。对比并评估了三种旨在对两性大脑大小的平均差异进行标准化的策略,以及五个不同的标准化变量。立体定向方法通过将MRI缩放到标准化空间来对个体间总体脑大小的差异进行标准化。比率方法使用五个不同脑大小指标之一,并将其除以CC区域。协变量方法在统计分析中使用其中一个指标作为协变量。男性受试者的绝对总面积以及前三分之一和后中体明显更大。然而,在三种标准化策略中的两种,即立体定向法和比率法中,女性的总面积、前中体和压部相对较大。协变量方法在0.05水平上未显示任何显著差异。结果表明,不同的标准化和分析方法不一定等效且可互换。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验