Mouridsen H, Gershanovich M, Sun Y, Pérez-Carrión R, Boni C, Monnier A, Apffelstaedt J, Smith R, Sleeboom H P, Jänicke F, Pluzanska A, Dank M, Becquart D, Bapsy P P, Salminen E, Snyder R, Lassus M, Verbeek J A, Staffler B, Chaudri-Ross H A, Dugan M
Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Clin Oncol. 2001 May 15;19(10):2596-606. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.10.2596.
To compare the efficacy and tolerability of tamoxifen with that of letrozole, an oral aromatase inhibitor, with tamoxifen as first-line therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.
Nine hundred seven patients were randomly assigned letrozole 2.5 mg once daily (453 patients) or tamoxifen 20 mg once daily (454 patients). Patients had estrogen receptor- and/or progesterone receptor-positive tumors, or both receptors were unknown. Recurrence during adjuvant antiestrogen therapy or within the following 12 months or prior endocrine therapy for advanced disease precluded enrollment. One prior chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease was allowed. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP). Secondary end points included overall objective response rate (ORR), its duration, rate and duration of clinical benefit, time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival, and tolerability.
TTP was significantly longer for letrozole than for tamoxifen (median, 41 v 26 weeks). Treatment with letrozole reduced the risk of progression by 30% (hazards ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.82, P =.0001). TTP was significantly longer for letrozole irrespective of dominant site of disease, receptor status, or prior adjuvant antiestrogen therapy. Similarly, TTF was significantly longer for letrozole (median, 40 v 25 weeks). ORR was higher for letrozole (30% v 20%; P =.0006), as was the rate of clinical benefit (49% v 38%; P =.001). Survival data are currently immature and not reported here. Both treatments were well tolerated.
Letrozole was significantly superior to tamoxifen in TTP, TTF, ORR, and clinical benefit rate. Our results support its use as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.
比较他莫昔芬与口服芳香化酶抑制剂来曲唑在绝经后晚期乳腺癌女性患者中作为一线治疗的疗效和耐受性,其中他莫昔芬为对照药物。
907例患者被随机分配,分别接受来曲唑2.5mg每日一次(453例患者)或他莫昔芬20mg每日一次(454例患者)治疗。患者的肿瘤为雌激素受体和/或孕激素受体阳性,或两种受体状态未知。辅助抗雌激素治疗期间或之后12个月内复发,或既往有晚期疾病内分泌治疗史者排除入组。允许有一次转移性疾病的化疗方案。主要终点为疾病进展时间(TTP)。次要终点包括总客观缓解率(ORR)、缓解持续时间、临床获益率及持续时间、治疗失败时间(TTF)、总生存期和耐受性。
来曲唑组的TTP显著长于他莫昔芬组(中位数,41周对26周)。来曲唑治疗使疾病进展风险降低30%(风险比,0.70;95%置信区间,0.60至0.82,P = 0.0001)。无论疾病的主要部位、受体状态或既往辅助抗雌激素治疗情况如何,来曲唑组的TTP均显著更长。同样,来曲唑组的TTF也显著更长(中位数,40周对25周)。来曲唑组的ORR更高(30%对20%;P = 0.0006),临床获益率也更高(49%对38%;P = 0.001)。生存数据目前尚不成熟,此处未报告。两种治疗的耐受性均良好。
来曲唑在TTP、TTF、ORR和临床获益率方面显著优于他莫昔芬。我们的结果支持将其用作绝经后晚期乳腺癌女性患者的一线内分泌治疗。