Coates Alan S, Keshaviah Aparna, Thürlimann Beat, Mouridsen Henning, Mauriac Louis, Forbes John F, Paridaens Robert, Castiglione-Gertsch Monica, Gelber Richard D, Colleoni Marco, Láng István, Del Mastro Lucia, Smith Ian, Chirgwin Jacquie, Nogaret Jean-Marie, Pienkowski Tadeusz, Wardley Andrew, Jakobsen Erik H, Price Karen N, Goldhirsch Aron
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG), IBCSG Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland.
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 10;25(5):486-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.8617. Epub 2007 Jan 2.
Previous analyses of the Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 four-arm study compared initial therapy with letrozole or tamoxifen including patients randomly assigned to sequential treatment whose information was censored at the time of therapy change. Because this presentation may unduly reflect early events, the present analysis is limited to patients randomly assigned to the continuous therapy arms and includes protocol-defined updated results.
Four thousand nine hundred twenty-two of the 8,028 postmenopausal women with receptor-positive early breast cancer randomly assigned (double-blind) to the BIG 1-98 trial were assigned to 5 years of continuous adjuvant therapy with either letrozole or tamoxifen; the remainder of women were assigned to receive the agents in sequence. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary end point.
At a median follow-up time of 51 months, we observed 352 DFS events among 2,463 women receiving letrozole and 418 events among 2,459 women receiving tamoxifen. This reflected an 18% reduction in the risk of an event (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.95; P = .007). No predefined subsets showed differential benefit. Adverse events were similar to previous reports. Patients on tamoxifen experienced more thromboembolic events, endometrial pathology, hot flashes, night sweats, and vaginal bleeding. Patients on letrozole experienced more bone fractures, arthralgia, low-grade hypercholesterolemia, and cardiovascular events other than ischemia and cardiac failure.
The present updated analysis, which was limited to patients on monotherapy arms in BIG 1-98, yields results similar to those from the previous primary analysis but more directly comparable with results from other trials of continuous therapy using a single endocrine agent.
既往对国际乳腺癌研究组(BIG)1-98四臂研究的分析比较了来曲唑或他莫昔芬的初始治疗,其中包括随机分配至序贯治疗组的患者,这些患者的信息在治疗变更时被截尾。由于这种呈现方式可能过度反映早期事件,因此本分析仅限于随机分配至持续治疗组的患者,并纳入了方案定义的更新结果。
8028例绝经后激素受体阳性早期乳腺癌女性被随机(双盲)分配至BIG 1-98试验,其中4922例被分配接受来曲唑或他莫昔芬5年的持续辅助治疗;其余女性被分配接受序贯治疗。无病生存期(DFS)是主要终点。
在中位随访时间51个月时,我们观察到来曲唑组2463例女性中有352例DFS事件,他莫昔芬组2459例女性中有418例事件。这反映出事件风险降低了18%(风险比,0.82;95%可信区间,0.71至0.95;P = 0.007)。没有预定义亚组显示出不同的获益。不良事件与既往报告相似。接受他莫昔芬治疗的患者发生更多血栓栓塞事件、子宫内膜病变、潮热、盗汗和阴道出血。接受来曲唑治疗的患者发生更多骨折、关节痛、轻度高胆固醇血症以及除缺血和心力衰竭之外的心血管事件。
本更新分析仅限于BIG 1-98单药治疗组的患者,其结果与既往主要分析结果相似,但与其他使用单一内分泌药物的持续治疗试验结果更具直接可比性。