Suppr超能文献

决策辅助工具对筛查项目的潜在贡献。

The potential contribution of decision aids to screening programmes.

作者信息

Entwistle V

机构信息

Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2001 Jun;4(2):109-15. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00141.x.

Abstract

Decision aids for health service users facing decisions about screening have been developed for controversial tests (such as that for prostate specific antigen as a screen for prostate cancer) and tests in which outcomes are value laden (as in some prenatal tests). The potential usefulness of decision aids in established screening programmes (such as those offering mammography to women over 50 in the United Kingdom) remains to be explored. In principle any decision about screening test acceptance may be sensitive to individual preferences and could be supported by an appropriate decision aid. Decision aids might also help reduce some of the problems currently associated with public misconceptions about screening. Objections to the promotion of individual choice regarding screening tests usually take the form of concern that this will lead to unacceptable losses in terms of population health gain and health system efficiency, or of fear that individuals will choose options that are wrong for them. The introduction of decision aids could alleviate both of these objections to some extent. Decision aids could encourage people to consider the social as well as the individual consequences of their choices and they should promote choices consistent with personal values. Although there are strong arguments in principle for introducing decision aids into established screening programmes, their potential needs to be confirmed in empirical evaluations and there may be many contentious decisions and practical challenges to be overcome in order to implement them.

摘要

针对面临筛查决策的卫生服务使用者,已开发出决策辅助工具,用于有争议的检测(如前列腺特异性抗原检测作为前列腺癌筛查)以及结果充满价值判断的检测(如一些产前检测)。决策辅助工具在既定筛查项目(如英国为50岁以上女性提供乳房X光检查的项目)中的潜在用途仍有待探索。原则上,任何关于接受筛查检测的决策可能对个人偏好敏感,并可得到适当的决策辅助工具的支持。决策辅助工具还可能有助于减少目前与公众对筛查的误解相关的一些问题。对促进关于筛查检测的个人选择的反对意见通常表现为担心这会导致在人群健康获益和卫生系统效率方面不可接受的损失,或者担心个人会选择对自己不利的选项。引入决策辅助工具在一定程度上可以缓解这两种反对意见。决策辅助工具可以鼓励人们考虑其选择的社会和个人后果,并且应该促进与个人价值观一致的选择。虽然原则上有很强的理由将决策辅助工具引入既定的筛查项目,但其潜力需要在实证评估中得到证实,并且为了实施这些工具可能需要克服许多有争议的决策和实际挑战。

相似文献

8
Decision making and prostate cancer screening.决策与前列腺癌筛查。
Urol Clin North Am. 2014 May;41(2):257-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2014.01.008. Epub 2014 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

5
Communicating with women about mammography.与女性交流乳腺钼靶检查相关事宜。
J Cancer Educ. 2007 Spring;22(1):25-31. doi: 10.1007/BF03174371.
8
Participation in screening programmes.参与筛查项目。
Health Expect. 2001 Jun;4(2):79-80. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00146.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Information and patient participation in screening for prostate cancer.前列腺癌筛查中的信息与患者参与
Patient Educ Couns. 1999 Jul;37(3):255-63. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00123-2.
2
The ethics of evidence-based patient choice.基于证据的患者选择的伦理问题。
Health Expect. 2001 Jun;4(2):87-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00137.x.
8
Survey of attitudes of pregnant women towards Down syndrome screening.孕妇对唐氏综合征筛查态度的调查。
Prenat Diagn. 2000 Jan;20(1):23-9. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0223(200001)20:1<23::aid-pd746>3.0.co;2-t.
9
Feasibility and effects of decision aids.决策辅助工具的可行性与效果
Med Decis Making. 2000 Jan-Mar;20(1):112-27. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0002000114.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验