• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者因素在一般实践中决策辅助工具的实施:一项定性研究。

Patient factors in the implementation of decision aids in general practice: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Honorary Research Associate, Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Kings College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2010 Mar;13(1):45-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00556.x. Epub 2009 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00556.x
PMID:19811545
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5060516/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Decision aids (DAs) have been developed to help patients make treatment decisions. Research shows that they are effective in increasing patients' knowledge of treatment options without raising anxiety or conflict. However, they have not been routinely adopted for use in general practice in the UK and there are few reports addressing strategies to introduce them.

OBJECTIVE

To examine patients' views about a variety of DAs for different conditions (heart disease, osteoporosis, osteoarthritis and breast cancer) in order to inform a strategy to introduce them into general practice.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

General practice patients over the age of 18 years being or having been treated for one of the conditions above.

METHODS

Qualitative study involving 12 focus groups with 77 patients evaluating decision aids relevant to their conditions. A semi-structured interview guide was used to generate discussions about the applicability of the DAs in routine general practice.

RESULTS

Patients welcomed DAs for their educational and informational content. Reactions to the DAs were influenced by patients' own personal desires for involvement. The main concerns were that the use of DAs would potentially shift the onus of decision making responsibility on to the patient and about the practical challenges to implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians will need to make explicit to patients that DAs are an adjunct to routine care and not a replacement, and therefore do not represent a derogation of responsibility. DAs need to be used as an integral part of the communication and support process for patients who want them.

摘要

背景

决策辅助工具(DAs)旨在帮助患者做出治疗决策。研究表明,它们在提高患者对治疗选择的了解方面非常有效,而不会增加焦虑或冲突。然而,它们并未在英国的常规实践中广泛采用,并且很少有报告探讨引入它们的策略。

目的

调查患者对各种针对不同疾病(心脏病、骨质疏松症、骨关节炎和乳腺癌)的决策辅助工具的看法,以便为将其引入常规实践提供策略。

设置和参与者

18 岁以上正在或曾经接受过上述条件之一治疗的普通科患者。

方法

一项定性研究,包括 12 个焦点小组,共有 77 名患者参与,评估与他们的病情相关的决策辅助工具。使用半结构化访谈指南生成关于 DAs 在常规普通科实践中适用性的讨论。

结果

患者欢迎 DAs 的教育和信息内容。对 DAs 的反应受到患者自身参与意愿的影响。主要关注点是,使用 DAs 可能会将决策责任转移到患者身上,以及实施的实际挑战。

结论

临床医生需要向患者明确表示,DAs 是常规护理的辅助手段,而不是替代手段,因此并不代表责任的减损。对于希望使用 DAs 的患者,DAs 需要作为沟通和支持过程的一个组成部分来使用。

相似文献

1
Patient factors in the implementation of decision aids in general practice: a qualitative study.患者因素在一般实践中决策辅助工具的实施:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2010 Mar;13(1):45-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00556.x. Epub 2009 Oct 7.
2
Designing a decision aid for cancer prevention: a qualitative study.设计癌症预防决策辅助工具:一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2024 Jun 12;41(3):349-359. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad042.
3
Exploring the Routine Administration of Decision Aids for Palliative Chemotherapy to Patients by Nurses: A Qualitative Study Among Nurses and Oncologists.
Cancer Nurs. 2015 Jul-Aug;38(4):270-8. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000182.
4
Impact of decision aids in a sustained implementation at a breast care center.决策辅助工具在乳腺保健中心持续实施中的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Feb;86(2):195-204. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
5
Exploring Provider Reactions to Decision Aid Distribution and Shared Decision Making: Lessons from Two Specialties.探索医疗服务提供者对决策辅助工具分发及共同决策的反应:来自两个专业领域的经验教训。
Med Decis Making. 2017 Jan;37(1):113-126. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16671933. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
6
Development of a Decision Aid for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Involving Intensive Care Unit Patients' and Health Professionals' Participation Using User-Centered Design and a Wiki Platform for Rapid Prototyping: A Research Protocol.一项使用以用户为中心的设计和维基平台进行快速原型制作的、涉及重症监护病房患者及医护人员参与的心肺复苏决策辅助工具的开发:一项研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Feb 11;5(1):e24. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5107.
7
Are cancer-related decision aids effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis.与癌症相关的决策辅助工具是否有效?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 20;27(6):974-85. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.16.0101. Epub 2009 Jan 5.
8
Communicative aspects of decision aids for localized prostate cancer treatment - A systematic review.局部前列腺癌治疗决策辅助工具的交流方面 - 系统评价。
Urol Oncol. 2019 Jul;37(7):409-429. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
9
If you build it, will they come? A qualitative evaluation of the use of video-based decision aids in primary care.如果你建造了它,他们会来吗?对基层医疗中基于视频的决策辅助工具使用情况的定性评估。
Fam Med. 2012 Jan;44(1):26-31.
10
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Mediation in Healthcare: Enhancing Conflict Resolution Between Patients and Physicians Beyond the Courtroom.医疗保健中的调解:超越法庭,加强医患之间的冲突解决。
Cureus. 2024 Dec 10;16(12):e75487. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75487. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Developing an implementation intervention, and identifying strategies for integrating health innovations in routine practice: A case study of the implementation of an insulin patient decision aid.制定实施干预措施,并确定将健康创新融入常规实践的策略:以实施胰岛素患者决策辅助工具为例。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 15;19(11):e0310654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310654. eCollection 2024.
3
Exploring practice and perspectives on shared decision-making about osteoporosis medicines in Fracture Liaison Services: the iFraP development qualitative study.探索骨折联络服务中关于骨质疏松症药物的共同决策的实践和观点:iFraP 发展定性研究。
Arch Osteoporos. 2024 Jun 19;19(1):50. doi: 10.1007/s11657-024-01410-6.
4
What helps the successful implementation of digital decision aids supporting shared decision-making in cardiovascular diseases? A systematic review.什么有助于支持心血管疾病共同决策的数字决策辅助工具的成功实施?一项系统评价。
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022 Nov 10;4(1):53-62. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztac070. eCollection 2023 Jan.
5
Stakeholder perspectives on the implementation of shared decision making to empower youth who have experienced commercial sexual exploitation.利益相关者对实施共同决策以增强遭受商业性剥削的青年权能的看法。
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2021 Mar;122. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105894. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
6
Implementation and sustainability factors of two early-stage breast cancer conversation aids in diverse practices.两种早期乳腺癌对话辅助工具在不同实践中的实施和可持续性因素。
Implement Sci. 2021 May 10;16(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01115-1.
7
Factors influencing implementation of an insulin patient decision aid at public health clinics in Malaysia: A qualitative study.影响马来西亚公共卫生诊所胰岛素患者决策辅助工具实施的因素:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 30;15(12):e0244645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244645. eCollection 2020.
8
The association between patients' preferred treatment after the use of a patient decision aid and their choice of eventual treatment.患者使用患者决策辅助工具后首选的治疗方法与最终选择的治疗方法之间的关联。
Health Expect. 2020 Jun;23(3):651-658. doi: 10.1111/hex.13045. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
9
Patients' views on the use of an Option Grid for knee osteoarthritis in physiotherapy clinical encounters: An interview study.患者对在物理治疗临床就诊中使用膝关节骨关节炎选项网格的看法:一项访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2017 Dec;20(6):1302-1310. doi: 10.1111/hex.12570. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
10
Qualitative Insights from the Osteoporosis Research: A Narrative Review of the Literature.骨质疏松症研究的定性见解:文献综述
J Osteoporos. 2016;2016:7915041. doi: 10.1155/2016/7915041. Epub 2016 Nov 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing breast cancer decision aids in community sites: barriers and resources.在社区场所实施乳腺癌决策辅助工具:障碍与资源
Health Expect. 2008 Mar;11(1):46-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00477.x.
2
Involvement in treatment decision-making: its meaning to people with diabetes and implications for conceptualisation.参与治疗决策:其对糖尿病患者的意义及概念化的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jan;66(2):362-75. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
3
Can patients' preferences for involvement in decision-making regarding the use of medicines be predicted?能否预测患者在药物使用决策中参与度的偏好?
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Jun;66(3):361-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.01.012. Epub 2007 Feb 27.
4
Decision aids in routine practice: lessons from the breast cancer initiative.常规实践中的决策辅助工具:乳腺癌倡议的经验教训。
Health Expect. 2006 Sep;9(3):255-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00393.x.
5
Patient involvement in treatment decision-making: the case for a broader conceptual framework.患者参与治疗决策:构建更广泛概念框架的理由。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Nov;63(3):268-78. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.05.002. Epub 2006 Jul 27.
6
Patients' preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review.患者参与医疗决策的偏好:一项叙述性综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Feb;60(2):102-14. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.02.003.
7
Involving patients in primary care consultations: assessing preferences using discrete choice experiments.让患者参与初级保健会诊:使用离散选择实验评估偏好。
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Jan;56(522):35-42.
8
Exploring the decision-making preferences of people with colorectal cancer.探索结直肠癌患者的决策偏好。
Health Expect. 2005 Jun;8(2):103-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00320.x.
9
Shared decision making and risk communication in practice: a qualitative study of GPs' experiences.实践中的共同决策与风险沟通:对全科医生经验的定性研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Jan;55(510):6-13.
10
Promoting the dissemination of decision aids: an odyssey in a dysfunctional health care financing system.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;Suppl Variation:VAR128-32. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.var.128.