• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Long term outcome and cost-effectiveness of stenting versus balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死支架置入术与球囊血管成形术的长期疗效及成本效益
Heart. 2001 Jun;85(6):667-71. doi: 10.1136/heart.85.6.667.
2
Cost-effectiveness of coronary stenting in acute myocardial infarction: results from the stent primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction (stent-PAMI) trial.急性心肌梗死中冠状动脉支架置入术的成本效益:心肌梗死支架直接血管成形术(Stent-PAMI)试验的结果
Circulation. 2001 Dec 18;104(25):3039-45. doi: 10.1161/hc5001.100794.
3
One-year clinical outcomes and relative costs of primary infarct artery stenting versus angioplasty following systemic thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死全身溶栓治疗后,梗死相关动脉直接支架置入术与血管成形术的1年临床结局及相对费用
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000 Feb;49(2):135-41. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-726x(200002)49:2<135::aid-ccd4>3.0.co;2-b.
4
Primary stenting versus primary balloon angioplasty for treating acute myocardial infarction.原发性支架置入术与原发性球囊血管成形术治疗急性心肌梗死的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;2005(2):CD005313. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005313.
5
Randomized comparison of coronary stenting with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction.在特定急性心肌梗死患者中冠状动脉支架置入术与球囊血管成形术的随机对照比较。
Circulation. 1998 Jun 30;97(25):2502-5. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.97.25.2502.
6
Coronary-artery stenting compared with balloon angioplasty for restenosis after initial balloon angioplasty. Restenosis Stent Study Group.冠状动脉支架置入术与球囊血管成形术治疗初次球囊血管成形术后再狭窄的比较。再狭窄支架研究组。
N Engl J Med. 1998 Dec 3;339(23):1672-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199812033392304.
7
Acute and long-term cost implications of coronary stenting.冠状动脉支架置入术的急性和长期成本影响
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 May;33(6):1610-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00051-0.
8
Comparison of primary coronary stenting to primary balloon angioplasty with stent bailout for the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Am J Cardiol. 1998 Apr 15;81(8):957-63. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00072-1.
9
Routine stenting vs. balloon angioplasty in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction due to proximal left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion.因左前降支近端冠状动脉闭塞导致的ST段抬高型心肌梗死中,常规支架置入术与球囊血管成形术的比较
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2009 Jan;10(1):22-6. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e32830a48d2.
10
Coronary angioplasty with or without stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction. Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group.急性心肌梗死伴或不伴支架植入的冠状动脉血管成形术。心肌梗死支架直接血管成形术研究组。
N Engl J Med. 1999 Dec 23;341(26):1949-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199912233412601.

引用本文的文献

1
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Historical perspective and new horizons.ST段抬高型心肌梗死:历史回顾与新视野
Neth Heart J. 2020 Aug;28(Suppl 1):93-98. doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01443-9.
2
Up to 15-Year Survival of Men and Women after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Paid by the Brazilian Public Healthcare System in the State of Rio de Janeiro, 1999-2010.1999年至2010年,巴西里约热内卢州公共医疗系统支付费用的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后男性和女性长达15年的生存率
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018 Oct 18;111(4):553-561. doi: 10.5935/abc.20180184.
3
Angiographic determinants of infarct size after successful percutaneous intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the impact of distal embolisation.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死成功进行经皮介入治疗后梗死面积的血管造影决定因素:远端栓塞的影响
Neth Heart J. 2002 Sep;10(9):353-359.
4
The decline effect in cardiovascular medicine: is the effect of cardiovascular medicine and stent on cardiovascular events decline over the years?心血管医学中的下降效应:心血管药物和支架对心血管事件的影响是否随着时间的推移而下降?
Korean Circ J. 2013 Jul;43(7):443-52. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2013.43.7.443.
5
Short term cost effectiveness of a regional myocardial infarction network.区域心肌梗死网络的短期成本效益。
Health Econ Rev. 2013 Apr 8;3(1):10. doi: 10.1186/2191-1991-3-10.
6
Primary Angioplasty for the Treatment of Acute ST-Segment Elevated Myocardial Infarction: An Evidence-Based Analysis.直接经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术治疗急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2004;4(10):1-65. Epub 2004 Aug 1.
7
A quantitative estimate of bare-metal stenting compared with balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction: angiographic measures in relation to clinical outcome.急性心肌梗死患者裸金属支架置入术与球囊血管成形术的定量评估:血管造影测量与临床结局的关系
Heart. 2007 Jul;93(7):792-800. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.093740.
8
Can the published cost analysis data for delivery of an efficient primary angioplasty service be applied to the modern National Health Service?已发表的关于提供高效直接冠状动脉介入治疗服务的成本分析数据能否应用于现代国民医疗服务体系?
Heart. 2005 Oct;91(10):1262-4. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.059402.
9
Primary stenting versus primary balloon angioplasty for treating acute myocardial infarction.原发性支架置入术与原发性球囊血管成形术治疗急性心肌梗死的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;2005(2):CD005313. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005313.
10
Is routine stenting for acute myocardial infarction superior to balloon angioplasty? A randomised comparison in a large cohort of unselected patients.急性心肌梗死的常规支架置入术是否优于球囊血管成形术?一项针对大量未选择患者的随机对照研究。
Heart. 2005 May;91(5):641-5. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.056705.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison of systematic stenting and conventional balloon angioplasty during primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. STENTIM-2 Investigators.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Jun;35(7):1729-36. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00612-4.
2
The volume of primary angioplasty procedures and survival after acute myocardial infarction. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators.急性心肌梗死后直接血管成形术的手术量与生存率。心肌梗死全国注册研究2调查人员。
N Engl J Med. 2000 May 25;342(21):1573-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005253422106.
3
Economic outcomes analysis of stenting versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for patients with coronary artery disease in Japan.
J Invasive Cardiol. 2000 Apr;12(4):194-9.
4
Coronary angioplasty with or without stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction. Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group.急性心肌梗死伴或不伴支架植入的冠状动脉血管成形术。心肌梗死支架直接血管成形术研究组。
N Engl J Med. 1999 Dec 23;341(26):1949-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199912233412601.
5
Effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition without thrombolytic therapy on reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction: results of ReoMI pilot study.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999 Dec;48(4):430-4. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-726x(199912)48:4<430::aid-ccd20>3.0.co;2-g.
6
Long-term benefit of primary angioplasty as compared with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction.与溶栓治疗相比,直接经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术对急性心肌梗死的长期益处。
N Engl J Med. 1999 Nov 4;341(19):1413-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199911043411901.
7
Primary stent implantation is superior to balloon angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: final results of the primary angioplasty versus stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction (PASTA) trial. PASTA Trial Investigators.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999 Nov;48(3):262-8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-726x(199911)48:3<262::aid-ccd5>3.0.co;2-4.
8
Limitation of myocardial infarct size after primary angioplasty: is a higher patency the only mechanism?
Am Heart J. 1999 Jun;137(6):1169-72. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70378-9.
9
Acute and long-term cost implications of coronary stenting.冠状动脉支架置入术的急性和长期成本影响
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 May;33(6):1610-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00051-0.
10
Abciximab in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction eligible for primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Results of the Glycoprotein Receptor Antagonist Patency Evaluation (GRAPE) pilot study.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 May;33(6):1528-32. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00038-8.

急性心肌梗死支架置入术与球囊血管成形术的长期疗效及成本效益

Long term outcome and cost-effectiveness of stenting versus balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Suryapranata H, Ottervanger J P, Nibbering E, van 't Hof A W, Hoorntje J C, de Boer M J, Al M J, Zijlstra F

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Isala Klinieken, Hospital de Weezenlanden, Groot Wezenland 20, 8011 JW Zwolle, Netherlands.

出版信息

Heart. 2001 Jun;85(6):667-71. doi: 10.1136/heart.85.6.667.

DOI:10.1136/heart.85.6.667
PMID:11359749
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1729781/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the long term clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness of stenting compared with balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS

Patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomly allocated to primary stenting (112) or balloon angioplasty (115). The primary end point was the cumulative first event rate of death, non-fatal reinfarction, or target vessel revascularisation. Secondary end points were restenosis at six months and the cost-effectiveness at follow up.

RESULTS

After 24 months, the combined clinical end point of death/reinfarction was 4% after stenting and 11% after balloon angioplasty (p = 0.04). Subsequent target vessel revascularisation was necessary in 15 patients (13%) after stenting and in 39 (34%) after balloon angioplasty (p < 0.001). The cumulative cardiac event-free survival rate was also higher after stenting (84% v 62%, p < 0.001). The angiographic restenosis rate after stenting was less than after balloon angioplasty (12% v 34%, p < 0.001). Despite the higher initial costs of stenting (Dfl 21 484 v Dfl 18 625, p < 0.001), the cumulative costs at 24 months were comparable with those of balloon angioplasty (Dfl 31 423 v Dfl 32 933, p = 0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with balloon angioplasty, primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction results in a better long term clinical outcome without increased cost.

摘要

目的

研究急性心肌梗死患者中,支架置入术与球囊血管成形术相比的长期临床疗效及成本效益。

方法

将急性心肌梗死患者随机分为直接支架置入组(112例)和球囊血管成形术组(115例)。主要终点是死亡、非致死性再梗死或靶血管血运重建的累积首次事件发生率。次要终点是6个月时的再狭窄情况及随访时的成本效益。

结果

24个月后,支架置入术后死亡/再梗死的联合临床终点为4%,球囊血管成形术后为11%(p = 0.04)。支架置入术后15例患者(13%)需要进行后续靶血管血运重建,球囊血管成形术后为39例(34%)(p < 0.001)。支架置入术后无心脏事件生存率也更高(84%对62%,p < 0.001)。支架置入术后血管造影再狭窄率低于球囊血管成形术(12%对34%,p < 0.001)。尽管支架置入术初始成本较高(21484荷兰盾对18625荷兰盾,p < 0.001),但24个月时的累积成本与球囊血管成形术相当(31423荷兰盾对32933荷兰盾,p = 0.83)。

结论

与球囊血管成形术相比,急性心肌梗死直接支架置入术可带来更好的长期临床疗效且成本未增加。