Ruvolo P P, Deng X, May W S
University of Florida Shands Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Gainesville 32610-0232, USA.
Leukemia. 2001 Apr;15(4):515-22. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402090.
Members of the Bcl2 family of proteins are important regulators of programmed cell death pathways with individual members that can suppress (eg Bcl2, Bcl-XL) or promote (eg Bax, Bad) apoptosis. While the mechanism(s) of Bcl2's anti-apoptotic function is not yet clear, introduction of Bcl2 into most eukaryotic cell types will protect the recipient cell from a wide variety of stress applications that lead to cell death. There are, however, physiologic situations in which Bcl2 expression apparently fails to protect cells from apoptosis (eg negative selection of thymocytes). Further, Bcl2 expression in patient tumor samples does not consistently correlate with a worse outcome or resistance to anticancer therapies. For example, patient response and survival following chemotherapy is independent of Bcl2 expression at least for pediatric patients with ALL. These findings indicate that simple expression of Bcl2 may not be enough to functionally protect cells from apoptosis. The finding that Bcl2 is post-translationally modified by phosphorylation suggests another level of regulation of function. Recent studies have shown that agonist-activated phosphorylation of Bcl2 at serine 70 (single site phosphorylation), a site within the flexible loop domain (FLD), is required for Bcl2's full and potent anti-apoptotic function, at least in murine IL-3-dependent myeloid cell lines. Several protein kinases have now been demonstrated to be physiologic Bcl2 kinases indicating the importance of this post-translational modification. Since Bcl2 phosphorylation has been found to be a dynamic process involving both a Bcl2 kinase(s) and phosphatase(s), a mechanism exists to rapidly and reversibly regulate Bcl2's activity and affect cell viability. In addition, multisite Bcl2 phosphorylation induced by anti-mitotic drugs like paclitaxel may inhibit Bcl2 indicating the potential wide range of functional consequences that this post-translational modification may have on function. While post-translational mechanisms other than phosphorylation may also regulate Bcl2's function (eg ubiquitination), this review will focus on the regulatory role for phosphorylation and discuss its potential clinical ramifications.
Bcl2蛋白家族成员是程序性细胞死亡途径的重要调节因子,其个别成员能够抑制(如Bcl2、Bcl-XL)或促进(如Bax、Bad)细胞凋亡。虽然Bcl2的抗凋亡功能机制尚不清楚,但将Bcl2导入大多数真核细胞类型中,可保护受体细胞免受多种导致细胞死亡的应激作用。然而,在某些生理情况下,Bcl2的表达显然无法保护细胞免于凋亡(如胸腺细胞的阴性选择)。此外,在患者肿瘤样本中,Bcl2的表达与较差的预后或抗癌治疗耐药性并无一致的相关性。例如,至少对于患有急性淋巴细胞白血病的儿科患者,化疗后的患者反应和生存率与Bcl2的表达无关。这些发现表明,单纯的Bcl2表达可能不足以在功能上保护细胞免于凋亡。Bcl2可通过磷酸化进行翻译后修饰这一发现提示了另一种功能调节水平。最近的研究表明,在丝氨酸70处(单一位点磷酸化)激动剂激活的Bcl2磷酸化是Bcl2充分且有效的抗凋亡功能所必需的,该位点位于柔性环结构域(FLD)内,至少在小鼠白细胞介素-3依赖的髓系细胞系中如此。现已证明几种蛋白激酶是生理性的Bcl2激酶,表明这种翻译后修饰的重要性。由于已发现Bcl2磷酸化是一个涉及Bcl2激酶和磷酸酶的动态过程,因此存在一种机制可快速且可逆地调节Bcl2的活性并影响细胞活力。此外,像紫杉醇这样的抗有丝分裂药物诱导的多位点Bcl2磷酸化可能会抑制Bcl2,这表明这种翻译后修饰可能对功能产生广泛的潜在功能后果。虽然除磷酸化外的其他翻译后机制也可能调节Bcl2的功能(如泛素化),但本综述将聚焦于磷酸化的调节作用并讨论其潜在的临床影响。