Kumar R J, Pegg S P, Kimble R M
Burns Unit, Royal Clinic Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
ANZ J Surg. 2001 May;71(5):285-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.2001.02104.x.
Various agents have been implicated in causing tissue necrosis after intravenous infusions have extravasated. These include solutions of calcium, potassium, bicarbonate, hypertonic dextrose, cytotoxic drugs and antibiotics. Views on management of these injuries differ, and range from a non-operative conservative approach to early debridement and grafting.
A retrospective review was undertaken of the hospital files of patients with extravasation injuries seen in three Australian hospitals. Nine patients were identified, and their management and long-term follow up are reported.
Age ranged from 17 days to 60 years. Two patients received their injuries from solutions containing isotonic dextrose/saline. The other seven patients received injuries from a variety of solutions including calcium gluconate (n = 1), parenteral nutrition (n = 1), sodium bicarbonate (n = 1), immunoglobulin (n = 1), gentamicin and penicillin (n = 1), flucloxacillin (n = 1), and the chemotherapeutic agents epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (n = 1). The sites involved included the dorsum of the right foot (n = 3), the dorsum of the left foot (n = 3), the right groin (n = 1), the right hand (n = 1) and the left hand (n = 1). Four patients were managed by delayed debridement and split skin grafting, while five were treated non-operatively. Prolonged scar management was necessary in seven of the nine patients. Final results were satisfactory in all patients who received skin grafting and in all patients who were managed conservatively.
Management of extravasation injuries should be conservative if possible. Delayed debridement and split skin grafting is required if the area of skin loss is extensive. Scar management remains a problem. Prevention of these injuries with the education of both medical and nursing staff remains the ultimate aim.
多种药物在静脉输注外渗后可导致组织坏死。这些药物包括钙、钾、碳酸氢盐、高渗葡萄糖溶液、细胞毒性药物和抗生素。对于这些损伤的处理观点不一,从非手术保守方法到早期清创和植皮。
对澳大利亚三家医院收治的外渗损伤患者的医院病历进行回顾性研究。共确定9例患者,并报告其治疗及长期随访情况。
患者年龄从17天至60岁不等。2例患者因含等渗葡萄糖/盐水的溶液导致损伤。另外7例患者因多种溶液导致损伤,包括葡萄糖酸钙(1例)、肠外营养(1例)、碳酸氢钠(1例)、免疫球蛋白(1例)、庆大霉素和青霉素(1例)、氟氯西林(1例)以及化疗药物表柔比星和环磷酰胺(1例)。受累部位包括右足背(3例)、左足背(3例)、右腹股沟(1例)、右手(1例)和左手(1例)。4例患者接受延迟清创和中厚皮片移植治疗,5例采用非手术治疗。9例患者中有7例需要长期瘢痕处理。所有接受植皮的患者以及所有采用保守治疗的患者最终结果均满意。
外渗损伤的处理应尽可能保守。如果皮肤缺失面积广泛,则需要延迟清创和中厚皮片移植。瘢痕处理仍然是一个问题。对医护人员进行教育以预防这些损伤仍是最终目标。