Mirrett S, Everts R J, Reller L B
Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Jun;39(6):2098-101. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.6.2098-2101.2001.
To evaluate the performance of BacT/ALERT FA (FA) medium, a new aerobic BacT/ALERT FAN (FAN) medium (Organon Teknika Corporation, Durham, N.C.) that does not require the added cost and inconvenience of a venting unit, we inoculated blood specimens from adult patients with suspected sepsis into an original FAN aerobic culture bottle and an FA bottle. Of 7,745 blood culture sets containing both bottles, 5,256 (68%) met the criteria for adequacy of filling. A total of 466 isolates judged to represent the causes of true infections were recovered from 276 patients; 271 isolates were recovered from both bottles, 82 were recovered from the FAN bottle only, and 113 were recovered from the FA bottle only (P < 0.05). More Burkholderia cepacia isolates (P < 0.01), Candida albicans isolates (P < 0.001), Cryptococcus neoformans isolates (P < 0.01), yeasts overall (P < 0.001), and total microorganisms (P < 0.05) were recovered from FA bottles. Of cultures found to be positive within the first 72 h of incubation, the mean times to detection were almost identical for FAN (20.4 h) and FA (20.7 h) bottles. Of 263 isolates that caused monomicrobic episodes of bloodstream infections, 180 were detected in both bottles, 32 were detected in FAN bottles only, and 51 were detected in FA bottles only (P < 0.05). Of 186 isolates considered to be contaminants, 63 were detected in both media, 64 were detected in FAN bottles only, and 59 were detected in FA bottles only (P was not significant). The number of false-positive results were comparable: 69 (1.3%) in FAN bottles and 56 (1.1%) in FA bottles. However, there were 14 isolates with false-negative results (6 yeasts, 6 nonfermenters, and 1 isolate each of Propionibacterium acnes and coagulase-negative staphylococci) in FAN bottles, whereas there were none in FA bottles. On the basis of these results, we conclude that the new nonvented FA bottle is superior to the original vented FAN medium for the recovery of B. cepacia and yeasts, especially C. albicans and C. neoformans, and is comparable to FAN medium for other microorganisms.
为评估BacT/ALERT FA(FA)培养基的性能,我们使用了一种新型需氧BacT/ALERT FAN(FAN)培养基(Organon Teknika公司,北卡罗来纳州达勒姆),该培养基无需增加通气装置的成本和不便之处。我们将成年疑似败血症患者的血标本接种到原装FAN需氧培养瓶和FA瓶中。在7745套同时含有这两种瓶子的血培养标本中,5256套(68%)符合充足灌装标准。从276名患者中总共分离出466株被判定为真正感染病因的菌株;271株从两种瓶子中均分离出,82株仅从FAN瓶中分离出,113株仅从FA瓶中分离出(P<0.05)。从FA瓶中分离出的洋葱伯克霍尔德菌菌株更多(P<0.01)、白色念珠菌菌株更多(P<0.001)、新型隐球菌菌株更多(P<0.01)、总体酵母更多(P<0.001)以及总微生物更多(P<0.05)。在培养孵育的前72小时内发现呈阳性的培养物中,FAN瓶(20.4小时)和FA瓶(20.7小时)的平均检测时间几乎相同。在263株导致血流感染单微生物发作的菌株中,180株在两种瓶子中均被检测到,32株仅在FAN瓶中被检测到,51株仅在FA瓶中被检测到(P<0.05)。在186株被认为是污染物的菌株中,63株在两种培养基中均被检测到,64株仅在FAN瓶中被检测到,59株仅在FA瓶中被检测到(P无显著性差异)。假阳性结果的数量相当:FAN瓶中有69例(1.3%),FA瓶中有56例(1.1%)。然而,FAN瓶中有14株出现假阴性结果(6株酵母、6株非发酵菌、痤疮丙酸杆菌和凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌各1株),而FA瓶中没有。基于这些结果,我们得出结论,新型无通气孔的FA瓶在分离洋葱伯克霍尔德菌和酵母,尤其是白色念珠菌和新型隐球菌方面优于原装带通气孔的FAN培养基,在分离其他微生物方面与FAN培养基相当。