White P M, Teasdale E M, Wardlaw J M, Easton V
University Department of Neurosurgery and Department of Neuroradiology, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland.
Radiology. 2001 Jun;219(3):739-49. doi: 10.1148/radiology.219.3.r01ma16739.
To compare computed tomographic (CT) angiography and magnetic resonance (MR) angiography with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the detection of intracranial aneurysms.
One hundred forty-two patients underwent intraarterial DSA to detect aneurysms. CT angiography, three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography, and intraarterial DSA were performed contemporaneously. Film hard-copy images and maximum intensity projection reconstructions of the CT angiograms and MR angiograms were reviewed at different times.
The accuracy per patient for the best observer was 0.87 at CT angiography and 0.85 at MR angiography. The accuracy per aneurysm for the best observer was 0.73 at CT angiography and 0.67 at MR angiography. Differences between readers and modalities were not significant. Interobserver agreement was good: kappa value of 0.73 for CT angiography and of 0.74 for MR angiography. The sensitivity for detection of aneurysms smaller than 5 mm was 0.57 for CT angiography and 0.35 for MR angiography compared with 0.94 and 0.86, respectively, for detection of aneurysms 5 mm or larger. The accuracy of both CT angiography and MR angiography was lower for detection of internal carotid artery aneurysms compared with that at other sites. With low observer confidence, the likelihood of correct interpretation was significantly poorer.
CT angiography and MR angiography have limited sensitivity in the detection of small aneurysms but good interobserver agreement. There is no significant difference in diagnostic performance between the noninvasive modalities.
比较计算机断层扫描(CT)血管造影、磁共振(MR)血管造影与动脉内数字减影血管造影(DSA)在颅内动脉瘤检测中的效果。
142例患者接受动脉内DSA以检测动脉瘤。同时进行CT血管造影、三维时间飞跃MR血管造影和动脉内DSA。在不同时间对CT血管造影和MR血管造影的胶片硬拷贝图像及最大密度投影重建图像进行评估。
最佳观察者对每位患者的检测准确率在CT血管造影时为0.87,在MR血管造影时为0.85。最佳观察者对每个动脉瘤的检测准确率在CT血管造影时为0.73,在MR血管造影时为0.67。不同观察者和不同检查方式之间的差异不显著。观察者间一致性良好:CT血管造影的kappa值为0.73,MR血管造影的kappa值为0.74。与直径5mm及以上动脉瘤的检测率(分别为0.94和0.86)相比,CT血管造影对直径小于5mm动脉瘤的检测敏感度为0.57,MR血管造影为0.35。与其他部位相比,CT血管造影和MR血管造影对颈内动脉动脉瘤的检测准确率均较低。观察者信心较低时,正确解读的可能性显著降低。
CT血管造影和MR血管造影在小动脉瘤检测中的敏感度有限,但观察者间一致性良好。这两种非侵入性检查方式的诊断性能无显著差异。