Suppr超能文献

颅内动脉瘤:CT血管造影和MR血管造影检测——在大型患者队列中的前瞻性盲法比较

Intracranial aneurysms: CT angiography and MR angiography for detection prospective blinded comparison in a large patient cohort.

作者信息

White P M, Teasdale E M, Wardlaw J M, Easton V

机构信息

University Department of Neurosurgery and Department of Neuroradiology, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland.

出版信息

Radiology. 2001 Jun;219(3):739-49. doi: 10.1148/radiology.219.3.r01ma16739.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare computed tomographic (CT) angiography and magnetic resonance (MR) angiography with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the detection of intracranial aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred forty-two patients underwent intraarterial DSA to detect aneurysms. CT angiography, three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography, and intraarterial DSA were performed contemporaneously. Film hard-copy images and maximum intensity projection reconstructions of the CT angiograms and MR angiograms were reviewed at different times.

RESULTS

The accuracy per patient for the best observer was 0.87 at CT angiography and 0.85 at MR angiography. The accuracy per aneurysm for the best observer was 0.73 at CT angiography and 0.67 at MR angiography. Differences between readers and modalities were not significant. Interobserver agreement was good: kappa value of 0.73 for CT angiography and of 0.74 for MR angiography. The sensitivity for detection of aneurysms smaller than 5 mm was 0.57 for CT angiography and 0.35 for MR angiography compared with 0.94 and 0.86, respectively, for detection of aneurysms 5 mm or larger. The accuracy of both CT angiography and MR angiography was lower for detection of internal carotid artery aneurysms compared with that at other sites. With low observer confidence, the likelihood of correct interpretation was significantly poorer.

CONCLUSION

CT angiography and MR angiography have limited sensitivity in the detection of small aneurysms but good interobserver agreement. There is no significant difference in diagnostic performance between the noninvasive modalities.

摘要

目的

比较计算机断层扫描(CT)血管造影、磁共振(MR)血管造影与动脉内数字减影血管造影(DSA)在颅内动脉瘤检测中的效果。

材料与方法

142例患者接受动脉内DSA以检测动脉瘤。同时进行CT血管造影、三维时间飞跃MR血管造影和动脉内DSA。在不同时间对CT血管造影和MR血管造影的胶片硬拷贝图像及最大密度投影重建图像进行评估。

结果

最佳观察者对每位患者的检测准确率在CT血管造影时为0.87,在MR血管造影时为0.85。最佳观察者对每个动脉瘤的检测准确率在CT血管造影时为0.73,在MR血管造影时为0.67。不同观察者和不同检查方式之间的差异不显著。观察者间一致性良好:CT血管造影的kappa值为0.73,MR血管造影的kappa值为0.74。与直径5mm及以上动脉瘤的检测率(分别为0.94和0.86)相比,CT血管造影对直径小于5mm动脉瘤的检测敏感度为0.57,MR血管造影为0.35。与其他部位相比,CT血管造影和MR血管造影对颈内动脉动脉瘤的检测准确率均较低。观察者信心较低时,正确解读的可能性显著降低。

结论

CT血管造影和MR血管造影在小动脉瘤检测中的敏感度有限,但观察者间一致性良好。这两种非侵入性检查方式的诊断性能无显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验