Kärrman E, Jönsson H
Water Environment Transport, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden.
Water Sci Technol. 2001;43(5):293-300.
In an environmental systems analysis of four wasterwater systems, the environmental aspects were prioritised by normalisation of predicted impacts from the studied systems to the total impacts from society. Priority Group 1 (highest priority) consisted of discharges (flows) of nitrogen, cadmium, lead and mercury to water, recycling of nitrogen and phosphorus to arable land and flows of heavy metals to arable land. A conventional wastewater system (A) was compared to irrigation of energy forest with biologically treated wastewater (B), liquid composting of toilet wastewater (C) and a conventional system supplemented with urine separation (D). Analysing the aspects in priority group one, systems B-D improved the management of plant nutrients and decreased the flow of heavy metals to water, while the flow to arable land increased, especially for system B. The suggested method is useful in municipal environmental planning and when choosing a wastewater system.
在对四个废水系统进行的环境系统分析中,通过将研究系统的预测影响归一化为社会总影响,对环境方面进行了优先排序。第一优先级组(最高优先级)包括氮、镉、铅和汞向水体的排放(流量)、氮和磷向耕地的循环利用以及重金属向耕地的流量。将传统废水系统(A)与用生物处理后的废水灌溉能源林(B)、厕所废水的液体堆肥处理(C)以及补充尿液分离的传统系统(D)进行了比较。分析第一优先级组中的各个方面,系统B - D改善了植物养分管理,减少了重金属向水体的流量,而向耕地的流量增加,特别是系统B。所建议的方法在城市环境规划和选择废水系统时很有用。