• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估正常分娩中的有效护理:博洛尼亚评分

Assessing effective care in normal labor: the Bologna score.

作者信息

Chalmers B, Porter R

机构信息

Centre for Research in Women's Health, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, 1212 Old Post Drive, Oakville, Ontario, Canada, L6M 1A6.

出版信息

Birth. 2001 Jun;28(2):79-83. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2001.00079.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1523-536x.2001.00079.x
PMID:11380378
Abstract

The intention of the "Bologna score" is to quantify, both in an individual labor and in a wider population, the extent to which labors have been managed as if they are normal as opposed to complicated. In this way it may be possible to assess both attitudes and practices within a maternity service toward the effective care of normal labor. A scoring system for normal labor was proposed at the World Health Organization (Regional Office for Europe) Task Force Meeting on Monitoring and Evaluation of Perinatal Care, held in Bologna in January 2000. This paper describes conceptual development of the scale. Recommendations for future evaluation of the Bologna score's validity and potential include field testing globally, comparison with the Apgar score, and evaluation of the relative weight contributed by each of the five measures comprising the Bologna score.

摘要

“博洛尼亚评分”的目的是在个体分娩以及更广泛的人群中,量化分娩被当作正常而非复杂情况来处理的程度。通过这种方式,或许有可能评估产科服务机构内对于正常分娩有效护理的态度和做法。2000年1月在博洛尼亚召开的世界卫生组织(欧洲区域办事处)围产期保健监测与评估特别工作组会议上,提出了一种正常分娩评分系统。本文描述了该评分表的概念发展。对博洛尼亚评分的有效性和潜力进行未来评估的建议包括在全球范围内进行实地测试、与阿氏评分进行比较,以及评估构成博洛尼亚评分的五项指标中每项指标的相对权重。

相似文献

1
Assessing effective care in normal labor: the Bologna score.评估正常分娩中的有效护理:博洛尼亚评分
Birth. 2001 Jun;28(2):79-83. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2001.00079.x.
2
Care in labor: a Swedish survey using the Bologna Score.分娩护理:一项使用博洛尼亚评分的瑞典调查。
Birth. 2008 Dec;35(4):321-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00259.x.
3
WHO principles of perinatal care: the essential antenatal, perinatal, and postpartum care course.世界卫生组织围产期保健原则:基本产前、围产期及产后保健课程
Birth. 2001 Sep;28(3):202-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2001.00202.x.
4
A literature review of quantitative indicators to measure the quality of labor and delivery care.衡量分娩护理质量的定量指标文献综述。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Feb;132(2):139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.07.014. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
5
Quality of maternal and neonatal care in Central Asia and Europe--lessons learnt.中亚和欧洲的孕产妇及新生儿护理质量——经验教训
BJOG. 2014 Sep;121(Suppl 4):11-4. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12819.
6
[Quality assessment of labor care provided in the Unified Health System in Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil, 1999-2001].[1999 - 2001年巴西东南部里约热内卢统一卫生系统提供的分娩护理质量评估]
Rev Saude Publica. 2008 Oct;42(5):895-902. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102008000500015.
7
Quality of intrapartum care for healthy women with spontaneous onset of labour in Rwanda: A health facility-based, cross-sectional study.卢旺达自发性分娩健康妇女的产时护理质量:基于卫生机构的横断面研究。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2019 Mar;19:78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
8
[Satisfaction with perinatal care in Vysočina region in the period between October 2013 and September 2014].[2013年10月至2014年9月期间维索基纳地区围产期护理满意度]
Ceska Gynekol. 2015 Dec;80(6):426-35.
9
[The use of Bologna Score to assess normal labor care in maternities].
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2015;36 Spec No:177-84. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2015.esp.56940.
10
The emergence of high-tech birthing.高科技分娩的出现。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008 Jan-Feb;37(1):85-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2007.00211.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation among experience of person-centered maternity care, provision of care and women's satisfaction: Cross sectional study in Colombo, Sri Lanka.以产妇为中心的照护体验、照护提供与妇女满意度之间的关联:斯里兰卡科伦坡的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 8;16(4):e0249265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249265. eCollection 2021.
2
Quality of maternal obstetric and neonatal care in low-income countries: development of a composite index.低收入国家孕产妇和新生儿产科护理质量:综合指数的制定。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jul 17;19(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0790-0.
3
Evaluating the content and quality of intrapartum care in vaginal births: An example of a state hospital.
评估阴道分娩中分娩期护理的内容与质量:以一家州立医院为例。
Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;14(1):10-17. doi: 10.4274/tjod.88123. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
4
Safe, healthy birth: what every pregnant woman needs to know.安全、健康分娩:每位孕妇需要了解的事项。
J Perinat Educ. 2009 Summer;18(3):48-54. doi: 10.1624/105812409X461225.
5
Care practice #3: continuous labor support.护理实践 #3:持续分娩支持。
J Perinat Educ. 2007 Summer;16(3):25-8. doi: 10.1624/105812407X217110.
6
Position paper: promoting, supporting, and protecting normal birth.立场文件:促进、支持和保护自然分娩。
J Perinat Educ. 2007 Summer;16(3):11-5. doi: 10.1624/105812407X217084.
7
Using the official lamaze guide in childbirth education classes.在分娩教育课程中使用官方的拉玛泽指南。
J Perinat Educ. 2006 Summer;15(3):47-9. doi: 10.1624/105812406X119020.
8
Promoting wellness in lamaze classes.在拉玛泽分娩法课程中促进健康。
J Perinat Educ. 2005 Summer;14(3):45-50. doi: 10.1624/105812405X57589.
9
Normal birth: two stories.
J Perinat Educ. 2002 Spring;11(2):1-12. doi: 10.1624/105812402X88669.
10
Questions from our readers: commentary on "lamaze in the 21st century".
J Perinat Educ. 2002 Winter;11(1):viii-ix. doi: 10.1624/105812402X88533.