Stimmel B
J Med Educ. 1975 Jul;50(7):657-61. doi: 10.1097/00001888-197507000-00001.
The advantages of a formal grading system in assessing a student's capability to practice medicine remain controversial. Students prefer the pass/fail method, while faculty lean toward the traditional approach. The efficacy of a modified pass/fail grading system in detecting superior academic achievement, as well as in predicting house staff performance, was evaluated. Mean scores on the examinations of the National Board of Medical Examiners of students selected fo Alpha Omega Alpha were significantly higher than those of other students, although the faculty was unaware of these results when selecting candidates. Chairmen in institutions where 125 students had served their first graduate year of training felt that 85 percent of the dean's letters summarizing the student's academic performance over a three-year period accurately indicated subsequent performance on the house staff. These results suggest that a modified pass/fail grading system can detect superior students as well as provide relevant information with respect to subsequent performance as a physician.
在评估学生行医能力方面,正式评分系统的优势仍存在争议。学生更喜欢通过/不及格的评分方式,而教师则倾向于传统方法。研究评估了改良的通过/不及格评分系统在检测卓越学术成就以及预测住院医师表现方面的有效性。入选阿尔法欧米茄阿尔法荣誉学会的学生在美国医学考试委员会考试中的平均成绩显著高于其他学生,尽管教师在选拔候选人时并不知晓这些结果。在有125名学生完成第一年研究生培训的机构中,系主任们认为,总结学生三年学业表现的院长推荐信中有85%准确地预示了他们随后在住院医师阶段的表现。这些结果表明,改良的通过/不及格评分系统既能发现优秀学生,也能提供与学生后续行医表现相关的信息。