• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于亚洲/太平洋岛民样本中自尊和主要生活事件的测量及结构的等效性。

Equivalencies regarding the measurement and constructs of self-esteem and major life events in an Asian/Pacific islander sample.

作者信息

Miyamoto R H, Hishinuma E S, Nishimura S T, Nahulu L B, Andrade N N, Johnson R C, Makini G K, Yuen N Y, Kim S P, Goebert D A, Carlton B S, Bell C K

机构信息

Native Hawaiian Mental Health Research Development Program (NHMHRDP), John A. Burns School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1356 Lusitana Street, 4th Floor, Honolulu, Hawaii 96813, USA.

出版信息

Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2001 May;7(2):152-63. doi: 10.1037/1099-9809.7.2.152.

DOI:10.1037/1099-9809.7.2.152
PMID:11381817
Abstract

Construct, scalar, and functional measurement equivalencies of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) and Major Life Events checklist (MLE) and the constructs assessed were investigated across groups differentiated on Hawaiian/part-Hawaiian and non-Hawaiian (e.g., Caucasian, Filipino, Hispanic, Japanese, and mixed/2 or more) ethnicity and gender. Initial results from maximum likelihood factoring with promax rotation showed that RSES negatively worded Item 5 loaded with the positively worded Items 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 on 1 of 2 factors for Hawaiian/part-Hawaiian female participants. Similarly, negatively worded Item 8 and the same positively worded items comprised 1 of 2 factors for non-Hawaiian male participants. For the other 2 Ethnicity x Gender groups, factors were respectively comprised of the 5 positively and 5 negatively worded RSES items. Construct equivalence or simple (2-factor) structure underlying the RSES was indicated across the 4 groups after Items 5 and 8 were excluded from a subsequent factoring procedure. Simple structure showed that Factor 1 comprised the positively worded Items 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7, and the remaining negatively worded Items 3, 9, and 10 loaded on Factor 2. Scalar equivalence of the self-esteem and major life events measures was supported by the statistical nonsignificance of the Major Life Events x Ethnicity x Gender interaction effect in multiple regression models. The consistency in the absolute size and direction of the intercorrelations between overall self-esteem, self-esteem Factors 1 and 2, and major life events variables indicated the functional equivalence of respective measures and constructs assessed. Measurement equivalency findings concerning the RSES and MLE, the constructs measured, and their utility versus caution against their use in multiethnic studies were discussed.

摘要

对罗森伯格自尊量表(RSES)和主要生活事件清单(MLE)以及所评估的结构进行了构建、标量和功能测量等效性研究,研究对象为按夏威夷/部分夏威夷族裔和非夏威夷族裔(如白种人、菲律宾人、西班牙裔、日本人以及混血/两种或更多族裔)和性别区分的群体。采用最大似然因子分析和斜交旋转的初步结果表明,对于夏威夷/部分夏威夷族裔女性参与者,RSES中反向计分的第5项在两个因子中的一个上与正向计分的第1、2、4、6和7项载荷在一起。同样,对于非夏威夷族裔男性参与者,反向计分的第8项和相同的正向计分项目构成了两个因子中的一个。对于其他两个种族×性别组,因子分别由5个正向计分和5个反向计分的RSES项目组成。在后续的因子分析过程中排除第5项和第8项后,表明RSES在这4个组中存在结构等效性或简单(双因子)结构。简单结构表明,因子1包含正向计分的第1、2、4、6和7项,其余反向计分的第3、9和10项载荷在因子2上。自尊和主要生活事件测量的标量等效性得到了多元回归模型中主要生活事件×种族×性别交互效应的统计不显著性的支持。总体自尊、自尊因子1和2以及主要生活事件变量之间相互关联的绝对大小和方向的一致性表明了各自测量方法和所评估结构的功能等效性。讨论了关于RSES和MLE的测量等效性结果、所测量的结构以及它们在多民族研究中的效用与使用时的注意事项。

相似文献

1
Equivalencies regarding the measurement and constructs of self-esteem and major life events in an Asian/Pacific islander sample.关于亚洲/太平洋岛民样本中自尊和主要生活事件的测量及结构的等效性。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2001 May;7(2):152-63. doi: 10.1037/1099-9809.7.2.152.
2
Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in 53 nations: exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem.在53个国家同时开展罗森伯格自尊量表调查:探索全球自尊的普遍特征和文化特异性特征。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Oct;89(4):623-42. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.623.
3
Self-esteem and binge eating: Do patients with binge eating disorder endorse more negatively worded items of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale?自尊与暴食:暴食障碍患者是否更认同罗森伯格自尊量表中措辞负面的项目?
J Clin Psychol. 2021 Mar;77(3):818-836. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23065. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
4
Cognitive Abilities Explain Wording Effects in the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale.认知能力可以解释罗森伯格自尊量表中的措辞效应。
Assessment. 2020 Mar;27(2):404-418. doi: 10.1177/1073191117746503. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
5
An examination of the wording effect in the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale among culturally Chinese people.对文化背景为华人的群体在罗森伯格自尊量表中的措辞效应进行的一项研究。
J Soc Psychol. 2008 Oct;148(5):535-51. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.148.5.535-552.
6
The measurement of self-esteem among Korean Americans: a cross-ethnic study.美籍韩裔自尊水平的测量:一项跨种族研究。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2003 Feb;9(1):16-33. doi: 10.1037/1099-9809.9.1.16.
7
Neural Correlates of Biased Responses: The Negative Method Effect in the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Is Associated with Right Amygdala Volume.偏差反应的神经关联:罗森伯格自尊量表中的负性方法效应与右侧杏仁核体积相关。
J Pers. 2016 Oct;84(5):623-32. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12185. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
8
Investigating the psychometric properties of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem scale for South African residents of Greater Pretoria.调查罗森伯格自尊量表在比勒陀利亚大都市区南非居民中的心理测量特性。
Eval Health Prof. 2015 Jun;38(2):181-99. doi: 10.1177/0163278713504214. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
9
Validity and reliability of the arabic version of the self-report single-item self-esteem scale (A-SISE).自我报告单项自尊量表(A-SISE)阿拉伯语版本的有效性和可靠性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 May 22;23(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04865-y.
10
The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: translation and validation in university students.罗森伯格自尊量表:在大学生中的翻译与验证
Span J Psychol. 2007 Nov;10(2):458-67. doi: 10.1017/s1138741600006727.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining the immunoepigenetic-gut microbiome axis in the context of self-esteem among Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders.在夏威夷原住民和其他太平洋岛民的自尊背景下研究免疫表观遗传学-肠道微生物群轴。
Front Genet. 2023 Apr 19;14:1125217. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1125217. eCollection 2023.