定量计算机断层扫描与双能X线吸收法在评估慢性血液透析患者骨矿物质密度中的比较。

A comparison of quantitative computed tomography and dual X-ray absorptiometry for evaluation of bone mineral density in patients on chronic hemodialysis.

作者信息

Barnas U, Schmidt A, Seidl G, Kaider A, Pietschmann P, Mayer G

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Donauspital, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 2001 Jun;37(6):1247-52. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.24529.

Abstract

Chronic renal failure leads to a reduction of bone mineral density (BMD). Therefore, noninvasive methods to evaluate BMD are also used regularly in this patient population. In this study, we compared the results of two widely used methods, quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the lumbar spine and dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at different sites in 90 patients on chronic hemodialysis. Additionally, we also determined various clinical and biochemical data to assess their relationship to BMD at the different measurement sites. A total of 75% of our patients was found to have reduced BMD, and 25% had an average z-score below -2. Z-scores obtained by the different methods and at the different measurement sites within an individual patient varied considerably from completely normal to severely reduced values. Multivariate analyses using clinical and biochemical parameters showed lower values of BMD at all measurement sites after transplantation and marginally higher values after parathyroidectomy, which was seen only in DXA measurement at the femoral neck. We conclude from our study that determination of BMD in chronic hemodialysis patients yields highly variable results, depending on the technique used. As long as the exact clinical relevance of these results has not been determined, regular routine measurement of isolated sites of BMD cannot be advocated in this patient population.

摘要

慢性肾衰竭会导致骨密度(BMD)降低。因此,评估骨密度的非侵入性方法也经常用于这类患者群体。在本研究中,我们比较了两种广泛使用的方法的结果,即对90例慢性血液透析患者进行腰椎定量计算机断层扫描(QCT)和不同部位的双能X线吸收法(DXA)。此外,我们还测定了各种临床和生化数据,以评估它们与不同测量部位骨密度的关系。我们发现,共有75%的患者骨密度降低,25%的患者平均z值低于-2。同一患者通过不同方法和在不同测量部位获得的z值差异很大,从完全正常到严重降低。使用临床和生化参数进行的多变量分析显示,移植后所有测量部位的骨密度值较低,而甲状旁腺切除术后骨密度值略高,这仅在股骨颈的DXA测量中可见。我们从研究中得出结论,慢性血液透析患者骨密度的测定结果高度可变,这取决于所使用的技术。只要这些结果的确切临床相关性尚未确定,就不能提倡对这类患者群体常规单独测量骨密度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索