Suppr超能文献

电刺激作为治疗糖尿病足溃疡的辅助手段:一项随机临床试验。

Electric stimulation as an adjunct to heal diabetic foot ulcers: a randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Peters E J, Lavery L A, Armstrong D G, Fleischli J G

机构信息

Mexican American Medical Treatment Effectiveness Research Center, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Jun;82(6):721-5. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.23780.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate high-voltage, pulse-galvanic electric stimulation as an adjunct to healing diabetic foot ulcers.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial.

SETTING

University medical center.

PATIENTS

Forty patients with diabetic foot ulcers, consecutively sampled. Twenty patients each assigned to treatment and placebo groups. Five patients (2 treated, 3 placebo) withdrew because of severe infection.

INTERVENTIONS

Electric stimulation through a microcomputer every night for 8 hours. The placebo group used identical functioning units that delivered no current. Additional wound care consisted of weekly débridements, topical hydrogel, and off-loading with removable cast walkers. Patients were followed for 12 weeks or until healing, whichever occurred first.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Proportion of wounds that healed during the study period. Compliance with use of device (in hr/wk), rate of wound healing, and time until healing.

RESULTS

Sixty-five percent of the patients healed in the group treated with stimulation, whereas 35% healed with placebo (p = .058). After stratification by compliance, a significant difference was identified among compliant patients in the treatment group (71% healed), noncompliant patients in the treatment group (50% healed), compliant patients in the placebo group (39% healed), and noncompliant patients in the placebo group (29% healed, linear-by-linear association = 4.32, p = .038). There was no significant difference in compliance between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Electric simulation enhances wound healing when used in conjunction with appropriate off-loading and local wound care.

摘要

目的

评估高压脉冲直流电刺激作为辅助治疗糖尿病足溃疡的效果。

设计

随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的试点试验。

地点

大学医学中心。

患者

连续抽取40例糖尿病足溃疡患者。治疗组和安慰剂组各20例。5例患者(2例治疗组,3例安慰剂组)因严重感染退出。

干预措施

每晚通过微型计算机进行8小时的电刺激。安慰剂组使用功能相同但不输出电流的装置。额外的伤口护理包括每周清创、局部使用水凝胶以及使用可拆卸的石膏步行器减轻负重。对患者随访12周或直至伤口愈合,以先发生者为准。

主要观察指标

研究期间伤口愈合的比例。设备使用的依从性(小时/周)、伤口愈合率以及愈合所需时间。

结果

刺激治疗组65%的患者伤口愈合,而安慰剂组为35%(p = 0.058)。按依从性分层后,治疗组依从患者(71%愈合)、治疗组不依从患者(50%愈合)、安慰剂组依从患者(39%愈合)和安慰剂组不依从患者(29%愈合)之间存在显著差异(线性趋势检验 = 4.32,p = 0.038)。两组之间的依从性无显著差异。

结论

电刺激与适当的减轻负重和局部伤口护理联合使用时可促进伤口愈合。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验