Höglund M, Ljungman P, Weller S
Department of Internal Medicine, Haematology, University Hospital, S-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001 Jun;47(6):855-61. doi: 10.1093/jac/47.6.855.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the comparability of systemic aciclovir exposure at steady state in immunocompromised patients following oral valaciclovir 1000 mg tds and intravenous (iv) aciclovir 5 mg/kg tds. A two-centre, randomized, open label, two-way crossover study was undertaken. Patients aged 18-65 years who had undergone high-dose chemotherapy for cancer and were neutropenic (neutrophil count <0.5 x 109/mL) with normal renal function were recruited. The pharmacokinetic parameters of aciclovir after oral valaciclovir 1000 mg or iv aciclovir 5 mg/kg given as 1 h infusion, each administered every 8 h for seven doses, were compared. Fifteen patients were enrolled and 13 completed both treatments. The mean (s.d.) values for aciclovir after oral valaciclovir and iv aciclovir were: AUC0-8 76.3 (29.7) and 64.2 (20.0) microM x h; peak plasma concentration (Cmax) 26.6 (10.5) and 34.0 (11.9) microM; time to maximal plasma concentration (tmax) 2.01 (0.65) and 0.95 (0.19); and plasma elimination half-life (t1/2) 2.83 (0.91) and 2.44 (0.62) h, respectively. The mean absolute bioavailability of aciclovir from oral valaciclovir was 60 +/- 21%. Equivalent systemic exposure to aciclovir after oral valaciclovir 1000 mg and iv aciclovir 5 mg/kg was observed with AUC0-8 (oral/iv ratio = 1.16; 90% CI 0.98-1.39), whilst significantly reduced peak aciclovir concentrations were obtained with oral valaciclovir (ratio = 0.75; 90% CI 0.60-0.94). Oral valaciclovir offers a convenient, and possibly safer, alternative to iv aciclovir, delivering comparable systemic exposures with reduced peak levels. This may contribute to shorter hospitalization, reduced costs for healthcare providers and improved quality of life for patients.
本研究的目的是评估免疫功能低下患者在口服1000mg缬更昔洛韦每日三次(tds)和静脉注射(iv)阿昔洛韦5mg/kg每日三次后,稳态下全身阿昔洛韦暴露量的可比性。进行了一项双中心、随机、开放标签、双向交叉研究。招募了年龄在18 - 65岁之间、因癌症接受高剂量化疗且中性粒细胞减少(中性粒细胞计数<0.5×10⁹/mL)且肾功能正常的患者。比较了口服1000mg缬更昔洛韦或静脉注射5mg/kg阿昔洛韦(输注1小时)后阿昔洛韦的药代动力学参数,两种给药方式均每8小时给药一次,共给药七剂。15名患者入组,13名患者完成了两种治疗。口服缬更昔洛韦和静脉注射阿昔洛韦后阿昔洛韦的平均(标准差)值分别为:AUC₀ - ₈ 76.3(29.7)和64.2(20.0)微摩尔×小时;血浆峰浓度(Cmax)26.6(10.5)和34.0(11.9)微摩尔;达到血浆峰浓度的时间(tmax)2.01(0.65)和0.95(0.19)小时;血浆消除半衰期(t₁/₂)2.83(0.91)和2.44(0.62)小时。口服缬更昔洛韦后阿昔洛韦的平均绝对生物利用度为60±21%。口服1000mg缬更昔洛韦和静脉注射5mg/kg阿昔洛韦后,观察到阿昔洛韦的全身暴露量相当(AUC₀ - ₈,口服/静脉注射比值 = 1.16;90%可信区间0.98 - 1.39),而口服缬更昔洛韦后阿昔洛韦的峰浓度显著降低(比值 = 0.75;90%可信区间0.60 - 0.94)。口服缬更昔洛韦为静脉注射阿昔洛韦提供了一种方便且可能更安全的替代方案,全身暴露量相当,但峰浓度降低。这可能有助于缩短住院时间,降低医疗服务提供者的成本,并改善患者的生活质量。