Chetchotisakd P, Porramatikul S, Mootsikapun P, Anunnatsiri S, Thinkhamrop B
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Jul 1;33(1):29-34. doi: 10.1086/320878. Epub 2001 May 23.
We conducted a prospective randomized, double-blind, controlled study of cefoperazone-sulbactam (ratio, 1:1; cefoperazone 25 mg/kg/day) plus cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole [TMP-SMZ] at a ratio of 80:400; TMP, 8 mg/kg/day) versus ceftazidime (100 mg/kg/day) plus cotrimoxazole (TMP, 8 mg/kg/day) for the treatment of severe melioidosis. Of 219 patients enrolled in the study, 102 (47%) had culture-proven melioidosis. These patients were assigned randomly to 2 treatment groups, each with 50 patients (2 patients were excluded). Mortality rates were not significantly different between the 2 groups: 18% in the cefoperazone-sulbactam group versus 14% in the ceftazidime group. The crude difference in the mortality rate was 4%, but when adjusted for type of infection the difference was 0.9% (95% confidence interval, -3.6% to 5.4%; P = .696). The duration of defervescence and the bacteriological response of successfully treated patients were similar in both groups, and both treatment regimens were well tolerated. Cefoperazone-sulbactam plus cotrimoxazole might be used as an alternative to ceftazidime plus cotrimoxazole as treatment for severe melioidosis.
我们开展了一项前瞻性随机双盲对照研究,比较头孢哌酮-舒巴坦(比例为1:1;头孢哌酮25mg/kg/天)加复方新诺明(甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑[TMP-SMZ]比例为80:400;TMP,8mg/kg/天)与头孢他啶(100mg/kg/天)加复方新诺明(TMP,8mg/kg/天)治疗严重类鼻疽的效果。在纳入该研究的219例患者中,102例(47%)经培养证实患有类鼻疽。这些患者被随机分配到2个治疗组,每组50例(排除2例患者)。两组的死亡率无显著差异:头孢哌酮-舒巴坦组为18%,头孢他啶组为14%。死亡率的粗略差异为4%,但在对感染类型进行校正后,差异为0.9%(95%置信区间,-3.6%至5.4%;P = 0.696)。两组中成功治疗患者的退热时间和细菌学反应相似,两种治疗方案的耐受性均良好。头孢哌酮-舒巴坦加复方新诺明可作为头孢他啶加复方新诺明治疗严重类鼻疽的替代方案。