Thamprajamchit S, Chetchotisakd P, Thinkhamrop B
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.
J Med Assoc Thai. 1998 Apr;81(4):265-71.
A prospective randomized, double-blind, controlled study of cefoperazone/sulbactam (cefoperazone 25 mg/kg/day) + co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim 8 mg/kg/day) vs ceftazidime (100 mg/kg/day) + co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim 8 mg/kg/day) in the treatment of severe melioidosis was conducted at Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand, from July 1995 to September 1996. A total of 84 patients were enrolled in the study. Forty of them (48%) had culture-proven melioidosis and were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups, each group with 20 patients. Two cases (one in each treatment group) were excluded from the final analysis due to incomplete data. There was no significant difference in the mortality rate between the two groups-16 per cent (3/19) in the cefoperazone/sulbactam group vs 21 per cent (4/19) in the ceftazidime group (p > 0.05). Bacteriological responses of successfully treated patients were similar in both groups, and both treatment regimens were well tolerated. Cefoperazone/sulbactam + co-trimoxazole can therefore be used as an alternative treatment for severe melioidosis. However, to further support this conclusion, a study with a larger patient population is needed.
1995年7月至1996年9月,在泰国孔敬孔敬大学诗里拉吉医院进行了一项前瞻性随机双盲对照研究,比较头孢哌酮/舒巴坦(头孢哌酮25mg/kg/天)+复方新诺明(甲氧苄啶8mg/kg/天)与头孢他啶(100mg/kg/天)+复方新诺明(甲氧苄啶8mg/kg/天)治疗严重类鼻疽的效果。共有84例患者纳入研究。其中40例(48%)经培养证实患有类鼻疽,被随机分配到两个治疗组之一,每组20例。由于数据不完整,最终分析排除了2例(每个治疗组各1例)。两组死亡率无显著差异——头孢哌酮/舒巴坦组为16%(3/19),头孢他啶组为21%(4/19)(p>0.05)。两组成功治疗患者的细菌学反应相似,两种治疗方案耐受性均良好。因此,头孢哌酮/舒巴坦+复方新诺明可作为严重类鼻疽的替代治疗方法。然而,为进一步支持这一结论,需要进行一项纳入更多患者的研究。