Suppr超能文献

认知疗法与行为疗法在强迫症团体治疗中的比较

Cognitive versus behavior therapy in the group treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

作者信息

McLean P D, Whittal M L, Thordarson D S, Taylor S, Söchting I, Koch W J, Paterson R, Anderson K W

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Apr;69(2):205-14.

Abstract

This study examined the effects of cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT) compared with traditional behavior therapy (exposure and response prevention [ERP]) in the group treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Of the 76 participants who started treatment, 38 were wait-listed for 3 months before treatment to assess possible course effects. Both treatments were superior to the control condition in symptom reduction, with ERP being marginally more effective than CBT by end of treatment and again at 3-month follow-up. In terms of clinically significant improvement, treatment groups were equivalent on the conclusion of treatment, but 3 months later significantly more ERP participants met criteria for recovered status. Only 1 of 7 belief measures changed with treatment improvement, and the extent of this cognitive change was similar between CBT and ERP groups. Discussion includes consideration of optimal formats for the delivery of different types of treatment.

摘要

本研究考察了认知行为疗法(CBT)与传统行为疗法(暴露与反应阻止法[ERP])在强迫症团体治疗中的效果。在开始治疗的76名参与者中,38人在治疗前被列入候补名单3个月,以评估可能的病程影响。两种治疗在减轻症状方面均优于对照条件,到治疗结束时以及3个月随访时,ERP比CBT略更有效。就临床上的显著改善而言,治疗组在治疗结束时相当,但3个月后,达到康复状态标准的ERP参与者显著更多。7项信念测量指标中只有1项随治疗改善而改变,且这种认知变化的程度在CBT组和ERP组之间相似。讨论内容包括对不同类型治疗的最佳实施形式的考量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验