Johnson J L, Cheatham M L, Sagraves S G, Block E F, Nelson L D
Department of Surgical Education, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2001 Jun;29(6):1251-4. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200106000-00036.
To compare the safety and efficacy of single- vs. multiple-dilator techniques in the performance of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy.
Prospective randomized trial.
Intensive care units at a level 1 trauma center.
Fifty consecutive patients requiring tracheostomy for airway control or prolonged mechanical ventilatory support.
Patients were randomized to receive a percutaneous dilational tracheostomy by either the single- or multiple-dilator technique described by Ciaglia.
Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy was performed using the single-dilator technique in 6:01 +/- 3:03 mins and by the multiple-dilator technique in 10:01 +/- 4:26 mins (p <.0006). There were no statistically significant differences in complication rates between the two techniques. No major complications occurred with either technique.
The single-dilator percutaneous tracheostomy technique is a safe, cost-effective, and more rapidly performed method for bedside tracheostomy in the intensive care unit.
比较单扩张器技术与多扩张器技术在经皮扩张气管切开术中的安全性和有效性。
前瞻性随机试验。
一级创伤中心的重症监护病房。
连续50例因气道控制或长期机械通气支持而需要气管切开术的患者。
患者被随机分为接受由恰利亚描述的单扩张器技术或多扩张器技术进行经皮扩张气管切开术。
采用单扩张器技术进行经皮扩张气管切开术用时6:01±3:03分钟,采用多扩张器技术用时10:01±4:26分钟(p<.0006)。两种技术之间的并发症发生率无统计学显著差异。两种技术均未发生重大并发症。
单扩张器经皮气管切开术技术是重症监护病房床旁气管切开术的一种安全、经济有效且操作更快的方法。