• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮扩张气管切开术——一项评估两种系统的临床研究

Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy--a clinical study evaluating two systems.

作者信息

Van Heerden P V, Webb S A, Power B M, Thompson W R

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia.

出版信息

Anaesth Intensive Care. 1996 Feb;24(1):56-9. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9602400110.

DOI:10.1177/0310057X9602400110
PMID:8669656
Abstract

Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT), first described in the 1950s, has become a common bedside technique in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). This study compares the early complications associated with the use of the Ciaglia PDT (Cook Critical Care, Bloomington, USA) technique, with the newly available Portex PDT technique (Portex Ltd., UK). The Ciaglia technique was adopted in this ICU in July 1994 and twenty-nine patients had a tracheostomy using this set until January 1995. Complications during the procedure were collected prospectively. When the Portex PDT set became available in January 1995, it was decided to assess the complication rate of this technique and compare them to the previously-collected data using the Ciaglia PDT set. Twenty-five patients have had a tracheostomy using the Portex PDT set. There has been no mortality associated with either PDT set. Bleeding requiring intervention occurred in two patients in the Ciaglia group and three patients in the Portex Group. All these patients had a bleeding diathesis. Loss of airway control occurred on one occasion in the Ciaglia group due to premature removal of the endotracheal tube. The first routine tracheostomy tube change at day 7 was complicated in four cases in the Ciaglia group. One infected stoma was noted in the Ciaglia group at day 7. Both techniques result in rapid, safe placement of a tracheostomy tube in critically ill patients in the ICU, obviating the need for surgical referral and transport to the operating room.

摘要

经皮扩张气管切开术(PDT)于20世纪50年代首次被描述,现已成为重症监护病房(ICU)常见的床边操作技术。本研究比较了使用Ciaglia PDT(美国布卢明顿库克重症护理公司)技术与新推出的Portex PDT技术(英国Portex有限公司)相关的早期并发症。1994年7月该ICU采用了Ciaglia技术,截至1995年1月有29例患者使用该套件进行了气管切开术。术中并发症是前瞻性收集的。1995年1月Portex PDT套件可用后,决定评估该技术的并发症发生率,并将其与之前使用Ciaglia PDT套件收集的数据进行比较。有25例患者使用Portex PDT套件进行了气管切开术。两种PDT套件均未导致死亡。Ciaglia组有2例患者、Portex组有3例患者发生了需要干预的出血。所有这些患者均有出血倾向。Ciaglia组有1次因过早拔除气管内导管导致气道控制丧失。Ciaglia组在第7天首次常规更换气管切开管时,有4例出现并发症。Ciaglia组在第7天发现1例造口感染。两种技术都能在ICU的重症患者中快速、安全地置入气管切开管,无需转诊至外科并送往手术室。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy--a clinical study evaluating two systems.经皮扩张气管切开术——一项评估两种系统的临床研究
Anaesth Intensive Care. 1996 Feb;24(1):56-9. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9602400110.
2
Percutaneous tracheostomy: ciaglia blue rhino versus the basic ciaglia technique of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy.经皮气管切开术:Ciaglia Blue Rhino与经皮扩张气管切开术的基本Ciaglia技术对比
Anesth Analg. 2000 Oct;91(4):882-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200010000-00021.
3
Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy: the Ciaglia method versus the Portex [correction of Rapitrach] method.经皮扩张气管切开术:恰利亚法与波特克斯[拉皮特拉奇的修正]法对比
Anesth Analg. 1998 Sep;87(3):556-61. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199809000-00010.
4
Percutaneous tracheostomy in critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized comparison of two techniques.危重症患者的经皮气管切开术:两种技术的前瞻性随机对照研究
Crit Care Med. 2000 Nov;28(11):3734-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200011000-00034.
5
[Early and long-term results of percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy (PDT Ciaglia) in 195 intensive care patients].[195例重症监护患者经皮扩张气管切开术(Ciaglia法)的早期及长期结果]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1998 May;33(5):306-12. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994254.
6
Percutaneous tracheostomy: a clinical comparison of dilatational (Ciaglia) and translaryngeal (Fantoni) techniques.经皮气管切开术:扩张法(Ciaglia法)与经喉法(Fantoni法)的临床比较
Anesth Analg. 1999 Oct;89(4):938-43. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199910000-00022.
7
Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy or conventional surgical tracheostomy?经皮扩张气管切开术还是传统外科气管切开术?
Crit Care Med. 2000 May;28(5):1399-402. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200005000-00023.
8
Comparison between single-step and balloon dilatational tracheostomy in intensive care unit: a single-centre, randomized controlled study.在重症监护病房中单步式与球囊扩张式气管切开术的比较:一项单中心、随机对照研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2010 Jun;104(6):728-32. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq087. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
9
Prospective randomized comparison of progressive dilational vs forceps dilational percutaneous tracheostomy.前瞻性随机对照研究:渐进性扩张与钳夹扩张经皮气管切开术的比较
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2006 Feb;34(1):51-4. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0603400119.
10
Percutaneous tracheostomy.经皮气管切开术。
Ann Card Anaesth. 2003 Jan;6(1):19-26.

引用本文的文献

1
Percutaneous Tracheostomy under Real-time Ultrasound Guidance in Coagulopathic Patients: A Single-center Experience.实时超声引导下凝血功能障碍患者的经皮气管切开术:单中心经验
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb;24(2):122-127. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23344.
2
Comparison of Ciaglia and Griggs Percutaneous Tracheostomy Techniques - A Biomechanical Animal Study.恰利亚与格里格斯经皮气管切开术技术比较——一项生物力学动物研究
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019 Jun;23(6):247-250. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23174.
3
Percutaneous dilatational versus conventional surgical tracheostomy in intensive care patients.
重症监护患者经皮扩张气管切开术与传统外科气管切开术的比较
N Am J Med Sci. 2011 Nov;3(11):508-12. doi: 10.4297/najms.2011.3508.
4
Guidewire impaction during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy.经皮扩张气管切开术中导丝嵌顿
Indian J Anaesth. 2011 Mar;55(2):215. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.79888.
5
Otorhinolaryngological problems occurring within the intensive care unit.重症监护病房内出现的耳鼻咽喉科问题。
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Jun;29(6):884-889. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1764-5. Epub 2003 Apr 24.
6
Percutaneous tracheostomy: comparison of Ciaglia and Griggs techniques.经皮气管切开术:Ciaglia技术与Griggs技术的比较
Crit Care. 2000;4(2):124-8. doi: 10.1186/cc667. Epub 2000 Mar 3.
7
Percutaneous (Portex) tracheostomy: an audit of the Newcastle experience.经皮(Portex)气管切开术:纽卡斯尔经验的一项审计
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000 Mar;82(2):137-40.
8
Percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy: a double-blind randomized trial.经皮气管切开术与外科气管切开术:一项双盲随机试验。
Ann Surg. 1999 Nov;230(5):708-14. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199911000-00014.