Bramwell R, Carter D
Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK.
Midwifery. 2001 Jun;17(2):133-41. doi: 10.1054/midw.2000.0243.
to describe levels of knowledge relevant to genetic screening in a sample of midwives and obstetricians in the late 1990s, and to compare these with those found by Smith et al. in London and Wales, and reported in 1994; to describe health professionals' perceptions of an appropriate counselling process relating to genetic screening in comparison with recognised good practice; and to consider links between knowledge and perceptions of the counselling process.
a questionnaire study, including responses to a counselling scenario.
responses were obtained from 81 midwives and obstetricians from maternity services in the North West of England.
knowledge about procedures was very good, but knowledge about the probability of genetic abnormality was relatively poor, and respondents overestimated the efficacy and usefulness of tests. These findings were similar to those of Smith et al. (1994), suggesting that they are a good reflection of the national picture. In terms of reported information-giving and counselling practice, there were some respondents who would not check the woman's understanding of her baby's risk of a genetic abnormality, or the risk of a false result. Some respondents would give information based on their own (necessarily limited) experience, rather than national statistics, and give advice based on the choices they themselves would make. These findings reflect earlier, basic research on people's understanding of probabilistic information.
the findings of this study, together with those of earlier work cited, suggest a need for education and training which includes a specific focus on biases in understanding this type of probabilistic information. They also raise the question as to why tests which provide probabilistic data have been introduced without consideration of the known problems in understanding such information.
描述20世纪90年代末一组助产士和产科医生中与基因筛查相关的知识水平,并将其与史密斯等人于1994年在伦敦和威尔士所发现并报告的知识水平进行比较;描述健康专业人员对于与基因筛查相关的适当咨询过程的看法,并与公认的良好做法进行比较;并思考知识与对咨询过程的看法之间的联系。
一项问卷调查研究,包括对一个咨询场景的回答。
从英格兰西北部产科服务机构的81名助产士和产科医生那里获得了回复。
关于程序的知识掌握得非常好,但关于基因异常概率的知识相对较差,而且受访者高估了检测的功效和有用性。这些结果与史密斯等人(1994年)的结果相似,表明它们很好地反映了全国的情况。在报告的信息提供和咨询实践方面,有些受访者不会检查女性对其婴儿患基因异常风险或假结果风险的理解情况。有些受访者会根据自己(必然有限)的经验提供信息,而不是依据全国统计数据,并且会根据自己会做出的选择给出建议。这些结果反映了早期关于人们对概率信息理解的基础研究。
本研究的结果,连同所引用的早期研究工作的结果,表明需要开展教育和培训,其中特别关注在理解这类概率信息时存在的偏差。它们还提出了一个问题,即为何在没有考虑到理解此类信息时已知问题的情况下就引入了提供概率数据的检测。