Yudoh K, Kanamori M, Ohmori K, Yasuda T, Aoki M, Kimura T
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Toyama, Japan.
Br J Cancer. 2001 Jun 15;84(12):1610-5. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1837.
Previous studies have shown that the prognosis of patients who have tumours with high microvessel density (MVD) is worse than that of patients who have a lower density in a variety of cancers. In this study, we investigated the clinical relevance of neovascularity assessed by MVD and the concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the tumour tissue of patients with soft tissue sarcoma in comparison with major clinicohistologic parameters by univariate and multivariate analysis. In 115 patients with soft tissue sarcoma, MVD was measured by counting vessels stained with factor VIII antibody. The concentration of VEGF in the tumour tissue was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. These parameters were then compared with disease outcome. The concentration of VEGF in the tumour tissue, but not MVD, was found to be correlated with disease outcome in patients with soft tissue, sarcoma. VEGF concentration in the tumour tissue showed a relationship with the clinical stage and histologic grade of the tumour. There was no significant difference in the levels of tissue VEGF concentration and MVD among soft tissue sarcomas classified according to histologic type. The level of tissue VEGF concentration in patients who had subsequent local recurrence and metastasis were significantly higher than the respective values in patients who did not have such disease outcome. No significant correlation existed between MVD and the concentration of VEGF in the tumour tissue. Univariate analysis showed that a high tissue VEGF concentration was associated with poor overall survival of the patient and a greater probability that local recurrence and metastasis had occurred. Multivariate analysis revealed that the tissue concentration of VEGF is an independent prognostic factor for the disease outcome of patients with soft tissue sarcoma. VEGF concentration in the tumour tissue, but not MVD, is an additional prognostic parameter for disease outcome in patients with soft tissue sarcoma, regardless of histologic type.
既往研究表明,在多种癌症中,微血管密度(MVD)高的肿瘤患者的预后比密度低的患者差。在本研究中,我们通过单因素和多因素分析,调查了用MVD评估的新生血管形成以及血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)在软组织肉瘤患者肿瘤组织中的浓度与主要临床组织学参数相比的临床相关性。在115例软组织肉瘤患者中,通过计数用因子VIII抗体染色的血管来测量MVD。通过酶联免疫吸附测定法测定肿瘤组织中VEGF的浓度。然后将这些参数与疾病转归进行比较。结果发现,肿瘤组织中VEGF的浓度而非MVD与软组织肉瘤患者的疾病转归相关。肿瘤组织中VEGF的浓度与肿瘤的临床分期和组织学分级有关。根据组织学类型分类的软组织肉瘤之间,组织VEGF浓度和MVD水平无显著差异。发生局部复发和转移的患者的组织VEGF浓度水平显著高于未发生此类疾病转归的患者的相应值。肿瘤组织中MVD与VEGF浓度之间无显著相关性。单因素分析显示,高组织VEGF浓度与患者总体生存率低以及局部复发和转移发生的可能性更大相关。多因素分析显示,VEGF的组织浓度是软组织肉瘤患者疾病转归的独立预后因素。无论组织学类型如何,肿瘤组织中VEGF的浓度而非MVD是软组织肉瘤患者疾病转归的额外预后参数。