Roysam G S, Oakley M J
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, South Tyneside District Hospital, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom.
J Arthroplasty. 2001 Jun;16(4):454-7. doi: 10.1054/arth.2001.22388.
A prospective, randomized, and blinded trial was conducted with 89 consecutive primary knee arthroplasties comparing standard medial parapatellar arthrotomy with the subvastus approach. All patients received the same prosthesis (Insall-Burstein II) inserted by one surgeon using an identical technique with the only difference being the approach. The parapatellar approach (group I) was used in 43 knees, and in the remaining 46 knees the subvastus approach (group II) was used. Assessment revealed significantly earlier return of straight-leg raise (3.2 days vs 5.8 days, P <.001), lower consumption of opiates in the first week (78 mg vs 102 mg, P <.001), less blood loss (527 mL vs 748 mL, P <.001), and greater knee flexion at 1 week (78 degrees vs 55 degrees, P <.001) in group II (subvastus approach). The subvastus approach offers early advantages over the standard parapatellar arthrotomy. It preserves the integrity of the vastus medialis and peripatellar plexus of vessels. We advise its wider use in primary total knee arthroplasty.
一项前瞻性、随机、双盲试验纳入了89例连续的初次膝关节置换术患者,比较标准内侧髌旁入路与股直肌下入路。所有患者均接受由同一位外科医生使用相同技术植入的相同假体(Insall-Burstein II型),唯一的区别在于入路方式。43例膝关节采用髌旁入路(I组),其余46例膝关节采用股直肌下入路(II组)。评估显示,II组(股直肌下入路)患者直腿抬高恢复明显更早(3.2天对5.8天,P<.001),第一周阿片类药物消耗量更低(78毫克对102毫克,P<.001),失血量更少(527毫升对748毫升,P<.001),且术后1周膝关节屈曲度更大(78度对55度,P<.001)。股直肌下入路相较于标准髌旁入路具有早期优势。它保留了股内侧肌和髌周血管丛的完整性。我们建议在初次全膝关节置换术中更广泛地使用该入路。