Brusori S, Braccaioli L, Bnà C, Lugaresi M L, Di Simone M P, Mattioli S, Gavelli G
Servizio di Radiologia, Direzione Universitaria, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna.
Radiol Med. 2001 Mar;101(3):125-32.
To repropose the importance of videofluoroscopy in the study of esophageal motor disorders, comparing the radiologic and manometric results; the manometric results are considered the reference parameters.
From 1996 to 1999, 76 patients (42 males and 34 females), were studied first using manometry and then videofluoroscopy. The patients had symptoms like dysphagia, thoracic pain or both. The manometric study was performed with a perfusional system equipped with 6 tips (4 radial for the study of the esophageal sphincters and 2 placed longitudinally for the study of the esophageal peristalsis). With the patient in a supine position we analysed 5-10 deglutitions with 5 ml water bolus at 20-25 degrees C, administered using a graduated syringe. The radiologic study was performed with a remote-control digital television system, connected to a video recorder. Three 7.5 ml bolues of high density barium suspension (250% weight/volume) were injected orally in the upright position and other three were injected in the prone position following the passage from the oral cavity to the stomach.
The comparison of the manometric and videofluoroscopic results suggests that the total sensitivity of the radiological study in the detection of esophageal motor disorders was 92%. In particular dynamic radiologic investigation diagnosed the normal esophageal functionality in 100% of the cases, nonspecific esophageal motility disorders in 89.6%, diffuse esophageal spasm in 100% of the cases, the presence of achalasia in 90%, whereas "nutcraker esophagus" only in 50%. Videofluoroscopy therefore showed high sensitivity in four groups of the five considered. It has some limitations in the diagnosis of initial achalasia, and is not sufficiently sensitive in the diagnosis of "nutcracker esophagus".
Videofluoroscopy is a simple method which presents high sensitivity and specificity in the detection of motility disorders of the esophagus and could therefore be proposed as the first diagnostic method in patients with specific symptoms.
通过比较放射学和测压结果,重新强调视频透视在食管运动障碍研究中的重要性;测压结果被视为参考参数。
1996年至1999年,对76例患者(42例男性和34例女性)进行研究,先进行测压,然后进行视频透视。患者有吞咽困难、胸痛或两者皆有的症状。测压研究使用配备6个探头的灌注系统进行(4个用于食管括约肌研究的径向探头和2个用于食管蠕动研究的纵向探头)。患者仰卧位时,使用刻度注射器给予5毫升20 - 25摄氏度的水团注,分析5 - 10次吞咽情况。放射学研究使用连接到录像机的遥控数字电视系统进行。在直立位口服注入三剂7.5毫升高密度钡剂混悬液(重量/体积为250%),从口腔到胃后,在俯卧位再注入另外三剂。
测压和视频透视结果的比较表明,放射学研究在检测食管运动障碍方面的总敏感性为92%。特别是动态放射学检查在100%的病例中诊断出正常食管功能,在89.6%的病例中诊断出非特异性食管动力障碍,在100%的病例中诊断出弥漫性食管痉挛,在90%的病例中诊断出贲门失弛缓症,而“胡桃夹食管”仅在50%的病例中被诊断出。因此,视频透视在五组中的四组中显示出高敏感性。它在早期贲门失弛缓症的诊断中有一些局限性,在“胡桃夹食管”的诊断中敏感性不足。
视频透视是一种简单的方法,在检测食管动力障碍方面具有高敏感性和特异性,因此可作为有特定症状患者的首选诊断方法。