Suppr超能文献

使用活性安慰剂的抗抑郁药。

Antidepressants using active placebos.

作者信息

Moncrieff J, Wessely S, Hardy R

机构信息

Psychiatry, Charing Cross Hospital, Gloucester House, 194, Hammersmith road, London, UK, W6 8BS.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(2):CD003012. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003012.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although there is a consensus that antidepressants are effective in depression, placebo effects are also thought to be substantial. Side effects of antidepressants may reveal the identity of medication to participants or investigators and thus may bias the results of conventional trials using inert placebos. Using an 'active' placebo which mimics some of the side effects of antidepressants may help to counteract this potential bias.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy of antidepressants when compared with 'active' placebos.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis review groups's search strategy was used to search MEDLINE (1966-2000), PsychLIT (1980-2000) and EMBASE (1974-2000) and this was last done in July 2000. Reference lists from relevant articles and textbooks were searched and 12 specialist journals were handsearched up to 1996.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi randomised controlled trials comparing antidepressants with active placebos in people with depression.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Since many different outcome measures were used a standard measure of effect was calculated for each trial. A subgroup analysis of inpatient and outpatient trials was conducted. Two reviewers independently assessed whether each trial met inclusion criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine studies involving 751 participants were included. Two of them produced effect sizes which showed a consistent and statistically significant difference in favour of the active drug. Combining all studies produced a pooled estimate of effect of 0.39 standard deviations (confidence interval, 0.24 to 0.54) in favour of the antidepressant measured by improvement in mood. There was high heterogeneity due to one strongly positive trial. Sensitivity analysis omitting this trial reduced the pooled effect to 0.17 (0.00 to 0.34). The pooled effect for inpatient and outpatient trials was highly sensitive to decisions about which combination of data was included but inpatient trials produced the lowest effects.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The more conservative estimates from the present analysis found that differences between antidepressants and active placebos were small. This suggests that unblinding effects may inflate the efficacy of antidepressants in trials using inert placebos. Further research into unblinding is warranted.

摘要

背景

尽管人们普遍认为抗抑郁药对抑郁症有效,但安慰剂效应也被认为相当显著。抗抑郁药的副作用可能会让受试者或研究者知晓所服用药物的真实身份,从而可能使使用惰性安慰剂的传统试验结果产生偏差。使用模拟抗抑郁药某些副作用的“活性”安慰剂可能有助于抵消这种潜在偏差。

目的

比较抗抑郁药与“活性”安慰剂的疗效。

检索策略

采用Cochrane协作网抑郁、焦虑与神经症综述小组的检索策略,检索MEDLINE(1966 - 2000年)、PsychLIT(1980 - 2000年)和EMBASE(1974 - 2000年),最近一次检索时间为2000年7月。检索了相关文章和教科书的参考文献列表,并手工检索了12种专业期刊至1996年。

选择标准

比较抗抑郁药与活性安慰剂治疗抑郁症患者的随机和半随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

由于使用了许多不同的结局指标,因此为每个试验计算了标准效应量。对住院患者和门诊患者试验进行了亚组分析。两名评价员独立评估每个试验是否符合纳入标准。

主要结果

纳入9项研究,共751名受试者。其中两项研究得出的效应量显示活性药物具有一致且具有统计学意义的优势。综合所有研究得出的合并效应估计值为0.39标准差(置信区间为0.24至0.54),表明抗抑郁药在改善情绪方面具有优势。由于一项结果非常积极的试验,存在高度异质性。剔除该试验后的敏感性分析将合并效应降至0.17(0.00至0.34)。住院患者和门诊患者试验的合并效应对纳入数据的组合决策高度敏感,但住院患者试验的效应最低。

评价员结论

本分析得出的较为保守的估计结果表明,抗抑郁药与活性安慰剂之间的差异较小。这表明在使用惰性安慰剂的试验中,非盲效应可能夸大了抗抑郁药的疗效。有必要进一步研究非盲效应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验