Suppr超能文献

用于治疗抑郁症的活性安慰剂与抗抑郁药对比

Active placebos versus antidepressants for depression.

作者信息

Moncrieff J, Wessely S, Hardy R

机构信息

Psychiatry, University College London, Warley hospital, Mascalls Lane, Brentwood, Essex, UK, CM14 4TU.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2004(1):CD003012. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003012.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although there is a consensus that antidepressants are effective in depression, placebo effects are also thought to be substantial. Side effects of antidepressants may reveal the identity of medication to participants or investigators and thus may bias the results of conventional trials using inert placebos. Using an 'active' placebo which mimics some of the side effects of antidepressants may help to counteract this potential bias.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy of antidepressants when compared with 'active' placebos.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis review groups's search strategy was used to search MEDLINE (1966-2000), PsychLIT (1980-2000) and EMBASE (1974-2000) and this was last done in July 2000. Reference lists from relevant articles and textbooks were searched and 12 specialist journals were handsearched up to 1996.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi randomised controlled trials comparing antidepressants with active placebos in people with depression.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Since many different outcome measures were used a standard measure of effect was calculated for each trial. A subgroup analysis of inpatient and outpatient trials was conducted. Two reviewers independently assessed whether each trial met inclusion criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine studies involving 751 participants were included. Two of them produced effect sizes which showed a consistent and statistically significant difference in favour of the active drug. Combining all studies produced a pooled estimate of effect of 0.39 standard deviations (confidence interval, 0.24 to 0.54) in favour of the antidepressant measured by improvement in mood. There was high heterogeneity due to one strongly positive trial. Sensitivity analysis omitting this trial reduced the pooled effect to 0.17 (0.00 to 0.34). The pooled effect for inpatient and outpatient trials was highly sensitive to decisions about which combination of data was included but inpatient trials produced the lowest effects.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The more conservative estimates from the present analysis found that differences between antidepressants and active placebos were small. This suggests that unblinding effects may inflate the efficacy of antidepressants in trials using inert placebos. Further research into unblinding is warranted.

摘要

背景

尽管人们普遍认为抗抑郁药对抑郁症有效,但安慰剂效应也被认为相当显著。抗抑郁药的副作用可能会向受试者或研究者暴露药物的身份,从而可能使使用惰性安慰剂的传统试验结果产生偏差。使用模拟抗抑郁药某些副作用的“活性”安慰剂可能有助于抵消这种潜在的偏差。

目的

研究与“活性”安慰剂相比,抗抑郁药的疗效。

检索策略

采用Cochrane协作网抑郁、焦虑与神经症综述小组的检索策略,检索MEDLINE(1966 - 2000年)、PsychLIT(1980 - 2000年)和EMBASE(1974 - 2000年),最近一次检索时间为2000年7月。检索了相关文章和教科书的参考文献列表,并手工检索了12种专业期刊直至1996年。

选择标准

比较抗抑郁药与活性安慰剂治疗抑郁症患者的随机和半随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

由于使用了许多不同的结局指标,为每个试验计算了一个标准效应量。对住院和门诊试验进行了亚组分析。两名评价者独立评估每个试验是否符合纳入标准。

主要结果

纳入了9项研究,共751名受试者。其中两项研究得出的效应量显示活性药物具有一致且具有统计学意义的优势。综合所有研究,通过情绪改善衡量,支持抗抑郁药的合并效应估计值为0.39个标准差(置信区间,0.24至0.54)。由于一项结果强烈为阳性的试验,存在高度异质性。排除该试验的敏感性分析将合并效应降至0.17(0.00至0.34)。住院和门诊试验的合并效应高度依赖于关于纳入哪些数据组合的决定,但住院试验产生的效应最低。

评价者结论

本分析中较为保守的估计发现,抗抑郁药与活性安慰剂之间的差异较小。这表明在使用惰性安慰剂的试验中,非盲法效应可能夸大了抗抑郁药的疗效。有必要对非盲法进行进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Active placebos versus antidepressants for depression.用于治疗抑郁症的活性安慰剂与抗抑郁药对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2004(1):CD003012. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003012.pub2.
2
Antidepressants using active placebos.使用活性安慰剂的抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(2):CD003012. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003012.
3
Antidepressants for depression in adults with HIV infection.用于感染HIV的成年抑郁症患者的抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;1(1):CD008525. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008525.pub3.
5
Antidepressants versus placebo for panic disorder in adults.成人惊恐障碍患者使用抗抑郁药与安慰剂的对照研究
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 5;4(4):CD010676. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010676.pub2.
8
WITHDRAWN: Antidepressants for depression in medical illness.撤回:用于治疗躯体疾病伴发抑郁症的抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;2000(4):CD001312. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001312.pub2.
9
Omega-3 fatty acids for depression in adults.ω-3 脂肪酸治疗成人抑郁症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 24;11(11):CD004692. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004692.pub5.
10
Pharmacological interventions for people with borderline personality disorder.药物干预治疗边缘型人格障碍患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 14;11(11):CD012956. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012956.pub2.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
THERAPEUTIC EFFICACY OF ANTIDEPRESSANT DRUGS. A REVIEW.
JAMA. 1964 Nov 2;190:448-55. doi: 10.1001/jama.1964.03070180046007.
10
EVALUATION OF DESIPRAMINE IN DEPRESSIVE STATES.去甲丙咪嗪在抑郁状态中的评估
J New Drugs. 1963 May-Jun;3(3):161-6. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1963.tb00073.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验