Kurz A F
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2001 May(120):5-8.
Cerebrovascular disease (CVD) and dementia frequently coexist in elderly patients. The question of whether the CVD causes the dementia depends on how 'dementia' is defined. Traditional definitions specified that dementia involved a decline in intellectual ability as a core feature. However, revised definitions have since stipulated two key elements: 1) a global rather than focal neurobehavioural deficit and 2) impairment in activities of daily living (ADL). When applied to CVD, these latter concepts of dementia raise difficulty: Focal cerebrovascular lesions in the cortex generate location-specific neurobehavioural deficits that are part of the dementia syndrome, but, even in combination, do not represent a global intellectual decline. Most cerebrovascular lesions are associated with physical symptoms that make it difficult to evaluate whether cognitive impairments have an independent impact on ADL. The majority of neurobehavioural symptoms in CVD are caused by small-vessel-type subcortical lesions and are dissimilar to those seen in Alzheimer's disease. There are several pathogenetic mechanisms, however, by which large-vessel or small-vessel CVD can cause global cognitive and intellectual impairments, allowing a diagnosis of vascular dementia (VaD): An accumulation of ischaemic lesions in the cortex may produce global intellectual impairment, particularly if they affect important areas of the brain. Single small infarcts, or haemorrhages in strategic subcortical locations, may interfere with specific circuits connecting the prefrontal cortex to the basal ganglia, or with nonspecific thalamocortical projections. This may generate combinations of executive dysfunction, personality change or apathy, which are associated with hypoperfusion and hypometabolism predominantly in frontal cortical areas. Extensive white matter lesions probably affect cognitive function through a loss of axons, producing a functional disconnection of the cortex. This can manifest as significant reductions in blood flow and metabolism in frontal, temporal and parietal cortical areas, which do not show any structural damage. Given the diversity of aetiological factors, pathological changes and pathogenetic mechanisms associated with VaD, several distinct syndromes must be distinguished. Further study is needed to demonstrate that this emerging concept can improve diagnosis, guide treatment and stimulate research.
脑血管疾病(CVD)和痴呆症在老年患者中经常并存。CVD是否会导致痴呆症这一问题取决于“痴呆症”的定义方式。传统定义规定,痴呆症以智力能力下降为核心特征。然而,修订后的定义此后规定了两个关键要素:1)全面而非局部的神经行为缺陷;2)日常生活活动(ADL)受损。当应用于CVD时,这些关于痴呆症的最新概念引发了困难:皮质中的局灶性脑血管病变会产生特定位置的神经行为缺陷,这些缺陷是痴呆症综合征的一部分,但即使综合起来,也不代表全面的智力下降。大多数脑血管病变都伴有身体症状,这使得难以评估认知障碍是否对ADL有独立影响。CVD中的大多数神经行为症状是由小血管型皮质下病变引起的,与阿尔茨海默病中所见的症状不同。然而,有几种致病机制,通过这些机制,大血管或小血管CVD可导致全面的认知和智力损害,从而允许诊断为血管性痴呆(VaD):皮质中缺血性病变的积累可能会导致全面的智力损害,特别是如果它们影响大脑的重要区域。单个小梗死灶或战略性皮质下部位的出血,可能会干扰连接前额叶皮质与基底神经节的特定回路,或干扰非特异性丘脑皮质投射。这可能会产生执行功能障碍、人格改变或冷漠等组合症状,这些症状主要与额叶皮质区域的灌注不足和代谢减退有关。广泛的白质病变可能通过轴突丧失影响认知功能,导致皮质功能脱节。这可能表现为额叶、颞叶和顶叶皮质区域的血流和代谢显著减少,而这些区域没有任何结构损伤。鉴于与VaD相关的病因因素、病理变化和致病机制的多样性,必须区分几种不同的综合征。需要进一步研究来证明这一新兴概念能否改善诊断、指导治疗并推动研究。