Stirling A M, Wilson P, McConnachie A
Department of General Practice, University of Glasgow, 4 Lancaster Crescent, Glasgow G12 0RR.
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Jun;51(467):456-60.
Recent research has shown the benefits of longer consultations in general practice. Approximately 40% of patients presenting to general practitioners (GPs) are psychologically distressed. Studies have shown that psychological morbidity increases with increasing socioeconomic deprivation. The combined effects of psychological morbidity and socioeconomic deprivation on consultation length are unknown. In addition, though it is known that doctors correctly identify half their distressed patients as such, the effect of consultation length on identification is unknown.
To examine factors associated with presentation and recognition of psychological distress in GPs' surgeries and the interaction of these factors with consultation length.
A cross-sectional study.
Nine general practices in the West of Scotland, involving 1075 consultations of 21 full-time GPs.
The main outcome measures were patient psychological distress (measured by General Health Questionnaire-12), doctors' identification of psychological distress, consultation length, and Carstairs deprivation category scores.
The mean consultation length was 8.71 minutes (SD = 4.40) and the prevalence of positive GHQ scores was 44.7%. Increasing GHQ (greater psychological distress) and lower deprivation category scores (greater affluence) were associated with longer consultations. Positive GHQ scoring increased with greater socioeconomic deprivation and also peaked in the 30 to 39 years age group. Recognition of psychological distress was greater in longer consultations (50% increase in consultation length associated with 32% increase in recognition).
Increasing socioeconomic deprivation is associated with higher prevalence of psychological distress and shorter consultations. This provides further evidence to support Tudor Hart's 'inverse care law' and has implications for the resourcing of primary care in deprived areas.
近期研究表明,在全科医疗中进行较长时间的会诊有诸多益处。约40%就诊于全科医生(GP)的患者存在心理困扰。研究显示,心理疾病发病率随社会经济剥夺程度的增加而上升。心理疾病和社会经济剥夺对会诊时长的综合影响尚不清楚。此外,尽管已知医生能正确识别出一半有困扰的患者,但会诊时长对识别的影响未知。
研究全科医生诊疗室中心理困扰的呈现与识别相关因素,以及这些因素与会诊时长的相互作用。
横断面研究。
苏格兰西部的9家全科诊所,涉及21名全职全科医生的1075次会诊。
主要结局指标包括患者心理困扰(用一般健康问卷-12测量)、医生对心理困扰的识别、会诊时长以及卡斯尔斯剥夺类别得分。
平均会诊时长为8.71分钟(标准差 = 4.40),一般健康问卷阳性得分的患病率为44.7%。一般健康问卷得分越高(心理困扰越大)以及剥夺类别得分越低(越富裕)与会诊时间越长相关。随着社会经济剥夺程度的增加,一般健康问卷阳性得分升高,且在30至39岁年龄组中也达到峰值。在较长时间的会诊中,对心理困扰的识别率更高(会诊时长增加50%,识别率增加32%)。
社会经济剥夺程度的增加与心理困扰的较高患病率和较短的会诊时间相关。这为支持图多尔·哈特的“逆关怀法则”提供了进一步证据,并对贫困地区初级医疗的资源配置具有启示意义。