Department of Behavioural Science and Health.
Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London.
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Jan 26;73(727):e104-e114. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0241. Print 2023 Feb.
Recent evidence suggests that faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) can rule out colorectal cancer (CRC) in symptomatic adults. To date, there has been little research exploring experiences of FIT for this population.
To explore patient experience and satisfaction with FIT in an 'early adopter' site in England.
Explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach combining mailed quantitative surveys with semi-structured telephone interviews.
Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyse quantitative data. Thematic analysis was used to assess qualitative transcripts.
The survey had 260 responders, and it found that satisfaction with FIT was high (88.7%). Compared with test satisfaction, the proportion of responders satisfied with their GP consultation and how they received their results was lower (74.4% and 76.2%, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that increased area-level deprivation and not receiving an explanation of the purpose of the test were associated with lower satisfaction with the GP consultation (both -values <0.05), while increased area-level deprivation and not receiving results from the GP were associated with lower satisfaction with receiving results (both -values <0.05). Interviews with responders ( = 20) helped explain the quantitative results. They revealed that 'not knowing the purpose of the test' caused 'anxiety' and 'confusion', which led to dissatisfaction. 'Not receiving results from GP' was considered 'unacceptable', as this left patients with a 'niggling doubt' and lack of diagnosis or assurance that they did not have cancer.
Patient satisfaction with symptomatic FIT is high. Efforts to improve satisfaction should focus on ensuring that patients understand the purpose of the test and always receive their test results.
最近的证据表明,粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)可用于排除有症状成年人的结直肠癌(CRC)。迄今为止,针对该人群,有关 FIT 体验的研究甚少。
探索英格兰“早期采用者”地点中 FIT 的患者体验和满意度。
结合邮寄定量调查和半结构化电话访谈的解释性序贯混合方法。
多变量逻辑回归用于分析定量数据。主题分析用于评估定性转录本。
该调查有 260 名应答者,结果发现 FIT 的满意度很高(88.7%)。与测试满意度相比,对 GP 咨询和获得测试结果的满意度较低(分别为 74.4%和 76.2%)。多变量分析表明,地区水平贫困程度增加和未获得测试目的的解释与对 GP 咨询的满意度降低有关(两者的 P 值均<0.05),而地区水平贫困程度增加和未从 GP 处获得结果与对获得结果的满意度降低有关(两者的 P 值均<0.05)。对应答者(n=20)的访谈有助于解释定量结果。他们发现,“不知道测试的目的”导致了“焦虑”和“困惑”,从而导致了不满。“未从 GP 处获得结果”被认为是“不可接受的”,因为这使患者产生了“挥之不去的疑虑”,缺乏诊断或保证他们没有癌症。
有症状 FIT 的患者满意度很高。为了提高满意度,应努力确保患者了解测试的目的,并始终获得他们的测试结果。