• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将空间语言建立在感知基础上:一项实证与计算研究。

Grounding spatial language in perception: an empirical and computational investigation.

作者信息

Regier T, Carlson L A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Green 414, 5848 South University Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Jun;130(2):273-98. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.2.273.

DOI:10.1037//0096-3445.130.2.273
PMID:11409104
Abstract

The present paper grounds the linguistic cdategorization of space in aspects of visual perception; specifically, the structure of projective spatial terms such as above are grounded in the process of attention and in vector-sum coding of overall direction. This is formalized in the attentional vector-sum (AVS) model. This computational model accurately predicts linguistic acceptability judgments for spatial terms, under a variety of spatial configurations. In 7 experiments, the predictions of the AVS model are tested against those of 3 competing models. The results support the AVS model and disconfirm its competitors. The authors conclude that the structure of linguistic spatial categories can be partially explained in terms of independently motivated perceptual processes.

摘要

本文将空间的语言分类建立在视觉感知的各个方面;具体而言,诸如“above”(在……之上)等投射空间术语的结构基于注意力过程以及整体方向的矢量和编码。这在注意力矢量和(AVS)模型中得到了形式化。该计算模型在各种空间配置下准确预测了空间术语的语言可接受性判断。在7个实验中,将AVS模型的预测与3个竞争模型的预测进行了测试。结果支持了AVS模型并否定了其竞争对手。作者得出结论,语言空间类别的结构可以部分地根据具有独立动机的感知过程来解释。

相似文献

1
Grounding spatial language in perception: an empirical and computational investigation.将空间语言建立在感知基础上:一项实证与计算研究。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Jun;130(2):273-98. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.2.273.
2
Language within your reach: near-far perceptual space and spatial demonstratives.触手可及的语言:近-远感知空间与空间指示词
Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):889-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.010. Epub 2008 Aug 15.
3
The effect of occlusion on the semantics of projective spatial terms: a case study in grounding language in perception.
Cogn Process. 2011 Feb;12(1):95-108. doi: 10.1007/s10339-010-0380-x. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
4
Grounding as a Side-Effect of Grounding.接地作为接地的副作用。
Top Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;10(2):389-408. doi: 10.1111/tops.12317. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
5
Spatial language and spatial representation.空间语言与空间表征
Cognition. 1995 Apr;55(1):39-84. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)00643-y.
6
Seeing ahead: experience and language in spatial perspective.
Mem Cognit. 2006 Mar;34(2):380-6. doi: 10.3758/bf03193415.
7
The magic spell of language: linguistic categories and their perceptual consequences.语言的魔力:语言类别及其感知结果
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Jul;93(1):23-33. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.23.
8
Does direction matter? Linguistic asymmetries reflected in visual attention.方向是否重要?视觉注意力中反映出的语言不对称性。
Cognition. 2019 Apr;185:91-120. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.006. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
9
Differential verbal, visual, and spatial working memory in written language production.书面语言产生中的言语、视觉和空间工作记忆的差异。
Percept Mot Skills. 2010 Feb;110(1):229-44. doi: 10.2466/PMS.110.1.229-244.
10
Similarity and proximity: when does close in space mean close in mind?相似性与接近性:空间上的接近何时意味着思维上的接近?
Mem Cognit. 2008 Sep;36(6):1047-56. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.6.1047.

引用本文的文献

1
Computer mouse tracking reveals motor signatures in a cognitive task of spatial language grounding.计算机鼠标追踪揭示了空间语言基础认知任务中的运动特征。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Oct;81(7):2424-2460. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01847-9.
2
Cued by What We See and Hear: Spatial Reference Frame Use in Language.受我们所见所闻的引导:语言中空间参照系的使用
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 13;9:1287. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01287. eCollection 2018.
3
Action compatibility in spatial knowledge developed through virtual navigation.通过虚拟导航发展的空间知识中的动作兼容性。
Psychol Res. 2020 Feb;84(1):177-191. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-0972-0. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
4
Qualitative spatial logic descriptors from 3D indoor scenes to generate explanations in natural language.用于从3D室内场景生成自然语言解释的定性空间逻辑描述符。
Cogn Process. 2018 May;19(2):265-284. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0824-7. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
5
An information theory analysis of spatial decisions in cognitive development.认知发展中空间决策的信息论分析
Front Neurosci. 2015 Feb 4;9:14. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00014. eCollection 2015.
6
Visual attention during spatial language comprehension.空间语言理解过程中的视觉注意力。
PLoS One. 2015 Jan 21;10(1):e0115758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115758. eCollection 2015.
7
Asymmetric coding of categorical spatial relations in both language and vision.语言和视觉中类别空间关系的非对称编码。
Front Psychol. 2012 Nov 20;3:464. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00464. eCollection 2012.
8
A neurobehavioral model of flexible spatial language behaviors.灵活空间语言行为的神经行为模型。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Nov;38(6):1490-511. doi: 10.1037/a0022643. Epub 2011 Apr 25.
9
The effect of occlusion on the semantics of projective spatial terms: a case study in grounding language in perception.
Cogn Process. 2011 Feb;12(1):95-108. doi: 10.1007/s10339-010-0380-x. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
10
Source-goal asymmetries in motion representation: Implications for language production and comprehension.运动表征中的源-目标不对称性:对语言产生和理解的启示。
Cogn Sci. 2010 Aug 1;34(6):1064-1092. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01107.x.