Klein B, Weirich G, Brauch H
Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institut für Klinische Pharmakologie, Stuttgart, Germany.
Hum Genet. 2001 May;108(5):376-84. doi: 10.1007/s004390100500.
In order to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the recently introduced high-throughput method DHPLC (denaturing high performance liquid chromatography) for mutation screening in the VHL tumor suppressor gene, we subjected DNA from 43 unrelated VHL patients with previously sequenced VHL germline mutations to this method. In addition, 36 genomic DNAs of unrelated individuals suspected of being VHL carriers but with unknown germline status were analyzed by DHPLC and sequencing. The aims of the present study were to compare mutation results obtained by direct sequencing and DHPLC, and a comparison of two different DHPLC systems. The sensitivity of DHPLC was tested with two commercial devices and protocols, i.e., the Varian-Helix system and the Wave Nucleic Acid Fragment Analysis system. Both resolved all but one mutation in exons 2 and 3 of the VHL gene. In contrast, the GC-rich exon 1 showed discrepancies in the rate of mutation detection. Whereas the Varian-Helix system detected 10/15 (67%) of the known mutations, the Wave Nucleic Acid Fragment Analysis system detected 13/14 (93%). All three mutations in samples with unknown mutation status were revealed by both systems raising the mutation detection rate to 72% and 94%, respectively. Cases with different substitutions at the same nucleotide showed different elution profiles, but similar elution profiles could be obtained from different mutations. The Wave Nucleic Acid Fragment Analysis system detected most VHL mutations; however, when a 100% detection rate is needed, sequencing is still required and must therefore be the standard VHL mutation detection procedure. Once a family-specific mutation has been established, DHPLC may be suitable for the rapid and cost-effective determination of VHL carrier status in family members.
为了评估最近引入的高通量方法——变性高效液相色谱法(DHPLC)用于筛查VHL肿瘤抑制基因突变的敏感性和特异性,我们对43名携带VHL种系突变且已进行过VHL基因测序的无关VHL患者的DNA进行了该方法检测。此外,还对36名疑似为VHL携带者但种系状态未知的无关个体的基因组DNA进行了DHPLC分析和测序。本研究的目的是比较直接测序法和DHPLC法获得的突变结果,以及比较两种不同的DHPLC系统。使用两种商业设备和方案,即瓦里安-螺旋系统和Wave核酸片段分析系统,对DHPLC的敏感性进行了测试。两种系统都解析出了VHL基因第2和第3外显子中除一个突变外的所有突变。相比之下,富含GC的第1外显子在突变检测率上存在差异。瓦里安-螺旋系统检测到了15个已知突变中的10个(67%),而Wave核酸片段分析系统检测到了14个已知突变中的13个(93%)。两种系统都检测出了所有3个突变状态未知样本中的突变,使突变检测率分别提高到了72%和94%。在同一核苷酸处发生不同替换的病例显示出不同的洗脱图谱,但不同突变可获得相似的洗脱图谱。Wave核酸片段分析系统检测到的VHL突变最多;然而,当需要100%的检测率时,仍需要进行测序,因此测序仍是VHL突变检测的标准程序。一旦确定了家族特异性突变,DHPLC可能适用于快速且经济高效地确定家族成员的VHL携带者状态。