Colonius H, Ozyurt J, Arndt P A
Institut für Kognitionsforschung, Universität Oldenburg, FB5-A6, D-26111, Oldenburg, Germany.
Vision Res. 2001 Jul;41(15):1951-68. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00084-0.
In a stop signal paradigm to investigate the control of human saccades subjects were instructed to make a saccade to a visual target appearing suddenly l5 degrees to the left or to the right of the fixation point. In 25% of the trials an auditory stop signal was presented after a variable delay that required the subject to inhibit the saccade. The stop signal was presented randomly at the target position, at the opposite side, or at fixation. Using different estimation techniques the average time needed to inhibit a saccade (stop signal processing time, or SSPT) was estimated on the basis of the race model. The SSPT estimates ranging from 50 to 100 ms (depending on subject) are shorter than those from previous studies with visual stop signals. Position of the auditory stop signal did not show an effect on countermanding effectiveness. We found saccadic response times consistent with the race model predictions for two subjects, while a third subject showed small but consistent violations. Moreover, all subjects showed a tendency towards hypometric saccades for responses that could not be inhibited. These findings are discussed with respect to recent neurophysiological results.
在一项用于研究人类扫视控制的停止信号范式实验中,受试者被要求向突然出现在注视点左侧或右侧15度处的视觉目标进行扫视。在25%的试验中,经过可变延迟后会呈现一个听觉停止信号,要求受试者抑制扫视。停止信号在目标位置、对侧或注视点处随机呈现。使用不同的估计技术,基于竞争模型估计抑制扫视所需的平均时间(停止信号处理时间,或SSPT)。SSPT估计值在50到100毫秒之间(取决于受试者),比之前使用视觉停止信号的研究结果要短。听觉停止信号的位置对取消指令的有效性没有影响。我们发现两名受试者的扫视反应时间与竞争模型预测一致,而第三名受试者表现出虽小但一致的偏差。此外,所有受试者对于无法被抑制的反应都表现出欠幅扫视的倾向。结合最近的神经生理学结果对这些发现进行了讨论。