Suppr超能文献

[不同缝线强度因素对半月板缝线在循环加载条件下行为的影响]

[Effect of various suture strength factors on behavior of meniscus sutures in cyclic loading conditions].

作者信息

Seil R, Rupp S, Jurecka C, Rein R, Kohn D

机构信息

Orthopädische Universitätsklinik, Kirrberger Strasse, 66421 Homburg/Saar.

出版信息

Unfallchirurg. 2001 May;104(5):392-8. doi: 10.1007/s001130050748.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze meniscal sutures under cyclic loading conditions for different suture types (vertical and horizontal mattress sutures) and suture materials (absorbable monofilament sutures: PDS 2-0; PDS-0, and PDS-1 USP). Testing was performed on medial porcine menisci, using a well-established biomechanical testing model with a complete longitudinal tear 3 mm from the periphery of the meniscus. Sixty specimens were used. One suture was tested at a time. During cyclic testing 100 load cycles were applied with a crosshead speed of 50 mm/min. Three different maximum loads (10 N, 20 N, and 40 N) were used. The preload was set at 5 N. After cyclic loading, the specimens were loaded until failure. During cyclic loading, a gap appeared between the two parts of the meniscus, and partial tissue failures were observed at the surface of the meniscus. Gapping was more marked with higher loads and with the weaker suture material (p < 0.001). Using PDS 0 and PDS 1 sutures, less partial tissue failures were observed compared to PDS 2-0 (p < 0.001). The ultimate failure loads after cyclic loading were higher with PDS-0 and PDS-1 sutures. With these suture materials vertical sutures were stronger than horizontal sutures (p < 0.05). Using PDS 2-0 this difference could not be found. These results show that the primary strength of meniscal sutures depends on the suture material. The frequency and the amount of gapping and partial tissue failures, which can be observed under cyclic loading, are less distinct with PDS-0 and PDS-1 compared to PDS 2-0. From a biomechanical point of view, PDS 0 and PDS 1 sutures are recommended for meniscal sutures to guarantee a high primary stability, a small amount of gapping, and few partial tissue failures.

摘要

本研究的目的是分析不同缝线类型(垂直褥式缝线和水平褥式缝线)和缝线材料(可吸收单丝缝线:PDS 2-0、PDS-0和PDS-1 USP)在循环加载条件下的半月板缝合情况。在内侧猪半月板上进行测试,使用一个成熟的生物力学测试模型,半月板周边3毫米处有一个完整的纵向撕裂。共使用了60个标本。每次测试一根缝线。在循环测试期间,以50毫米/分钟的十字头速度施加100个加载循环。使用了三种不同的最大载荷(10 N、20 N和40 N)。预加载设定为5 N。循环加载后,对标本加载直至失效。在循环加载期间,半月板的两部分之间出现了间隙,并且在半月板表面观察到了部分组织失效。载荷越高以及缝线材料越弱,间隙越明显(p < 0.001)。与PDS 2-0相比,使用PDS 0和PDS 1缝线时观察到的部分组织失效较少(p < 0.001)。循环加载后的最终失效载荷在使用PDS-0和PDS-1缝线时更高。对于这些缝线材料,垂直缝线比水平缝线更强(p < 0.05)。使用PDS 2-0时未发现这种差异。这些结果表明,半月板缝合的初始强度取决于缝线材料。与PDS 2-0相比,在循环加载下可观察到的间隙频率和量以及部分组织失效,在使用PDS-0和PDS-1时不太明显。从生物力学角度来看,推荐使用PDS 0和PDS 1缝线进行半月板缝合,以确保高初始稳定性、少量间隙和较少的部分组织失效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验