Moadab A, Rupley K F, Wadhams P
California College of Podiatric Medicine, San Francisco, USA.
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2001 Jun;91(6):288-93. doi: 10.7547/87507315-91-6-288.
This study evaluated the efficacy of a novel surfactant, allantoin, and benzalkonium chloride hand sanitizer using the US Food and Drug Administration's method for testing antiseptic hand washes that podiatric physicians and other health-care personnel use. The alcohol-free product, HandClens, was compared with an alcohol-based product, Purell. Independent researchers from the California College of Podiatric Medicine conducted the study using 40 volunteer students from the class of 2001. The results show that HandClens outperformed Purell and met the regulatory requirements for a hand sanitizer. Purell failed as an antimicrobial hand wash and was less effective than a control soap used in the study.
本研究采用美国食品药品监督管理局用于测试足病医生和其他医护人员使用的抗菌洗手液的方法,评估了一种新型表面活性剂、尿囊素和苯扎氯铵洗手液的功效。将不含酒精的产品HandClens与含酒精的产品普瑞来进行了比较。来自加利福尼亚足病医学院的独立研究人员使用2001级的40名志愿者学生进行了这项研究。结果表明,HandClens的表现优于普瑞来,并且符合洗手液的监管要求。普瑞来作为抗菌洗手液未达标,且比研究中使用的对照肥皂效果更差。