Flaherty L E, Atkins M, Sosman J, Weiss G, Clark J I, Margolin K, Dutcher J, Gordon M S, Lotze M, Mier J, Sorokin P, Fisher R I, Appel C, Du W
Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Jul 1;19(13):3194-202. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.13.3194.
The Cytokine Working Group performed a randomized phase II trial of two outpatient biochemotherapy regimens to identify an outpatient regimen with high antitumor activity and less toxicity than inpatient regimens which might be compared with chemotherapy or inpatient biochemotherapy regimens in future phase III trials.
Eighty-one patients with metastatic malignant melanoma received dacarbazine 250 mg/m(2)/d intravenously (IV) and cisplatin 25 mg/m(2)/d IV on days 1, 2, and 3, plus interferon (IFN) alfa-2b 5 mU/m(2) subcutaneously (SC) on days 6, 8, 10, 13, and 15, given every 28 days. Interleukin-2 (IL-2) was given daily on days 6 to 10 and 13 to 15. In group 1, IV IL-2 was given at 18.0 MU/m(2), and in group 2, SC IL-2 was given at 5.0 mU/m(2).
In group 1 (IV IL-2), there were five complete responses (CRs) and 11 partial responses (PRs) among 44 patients (objective response rate [ORR], 36%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 22% to 51%). In group 2 (SC IL-2), there was one CR and five PRs among the 36 patients (ORR, 17%; 95% CI, 4% to 29%). The median survival was 10.7 months in group 1 and 7.3 months in group 2. Eleven patients in group 1 and four patients in group 2 remain alive as of the last follow-up. Toxicities in both groups were similar. No patient required hospitalization for neutropenic fever.
Biochemotherapy has activity in these outpatient regimens with acceptable toxicity. The antitumor activity observed with the IV IL-2 regimen seems similar to that of inpatient biochemotherapy regimens. If inpatient biochemotherapy regimens develop an established role in the management of melanoma, future phase III trial comparisons with this outpatient IV IL-2 regimen would be appropriate.
细胞因子工作组开展了一项针对两种门诊生物化疗方案的随机II期试验,以确定一种具有高抗肿瘤活性且毒性低于住院治疗方案的门诊治疗方案,该方案未来可能会在III期试验中与化疗或住院生物化疗方案进行比较。
81例转移性恶性黑色素瘤患者在第1、2和3天接受静脉注射(IV)达卡巴嗪250mg/m²/d和顺铂25mg/m²/d,同时在第6、8、10、13和15天皮下注射(SC)干扰素(IFN)α-2b 5mU/m²,每28天重复一次。白细胞介素-2(IL-2)在第6至10天和第13至15天每日给药。在第1组中,静脉注射IL-2的剂量为18.0MU/m²,在第2组中,皮下注射IL-2的剂量为5.0mU/m²。
在第1组(静脉注射IL-2)中,44例患者中有5例完全缓解(CR)和11例部分缓解(PR)(客观缓解率[ORR]为36%;95%置信区间[CI]为22%至51%)。在第2组(皮下注射IL-2)中,36例患者中有1例CR和5例PR(ORR为17%;95%CI为4%至29%)。第1组的中位生存期为10.7个月,第2组为7.3个月。截至最后一次随访,第1组有11例患者存活,第2组有4例患者存活。两组的毒性相似。没有患者因中性粒细胞减少性发热而需要住院治疗。
生物化疗在这些门诊治疗方案中具有活性,毒性可接受。静脉注射IL-2方案观察到的抗肿瘤活性似乎与住院生物化疗方案相似。如果住院生物化疗方案在黑色素瘤治疗中确立了作用,那么未来与这种门诊静脉注射IL-2方案进行III期试验比较将是合适的。